NMIEX vs. EPDPX
Compare and contrast key facts about Northern Active M International Equity Fund (NMIEX) and EuroPac International Dividend Income Fund Class A (EPDPX).
NMIEX is managed by Northern Funds. It was launched on Jun 22, 2006. EPDPX is managed by Euro Pacific Asset Management. It was launched on Jan 10, 2014.
Performance
NMIEX vs. EPDPX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
NMIEX vs. EPDPX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NMIEX Northern Active M International Equity Fund | -2.63% | 34.98% | 4.43% | 20.82% | -17.17% | 14.41% | 11.70% | 22.93% | -13.76% | 29.06% |
EPDPX EuroPac International Dividend Income Fund Class A | 5.90% | 61.93% | 0.72% | 7.46% | 1.27% | 7.78% | 8.83% | 13.05% | -11.02% | 15.53% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NMIEX achieves a -2.63% return, which is significantly lower than EPDPX's 5.90% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with NMIEX having a 9.26% annualized return and EPDPX not far ahead at 9.56%.
NMIEX
- 1D
- -0.16%
- 1M
- -12.08%
- YTD
- -2.63%
- 6M
- 0.59%
- 1Y
- 21.57%
- 3Y*
- 14.63%
- 5Y*
- 8.42%
- 10Y*
- 9.26%
EPDPX
- 1D
- 0.14%
- 1M
- -9.40%
- YTD
- 5.90%
- 6M
- 16.78%
- 1Y
- 44.80%
- 3Y*
- 20.57%
- 5Y*
- 14.44%
- 10Y*
- 9.56%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
NMIEX vs. EPDPX - Expense Ratio Comparison
NMIEX has a 0.84% expense ratio, which is lower than EPDPX's 1.52% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
NMIEX vs. EPDPX — Risk / Return Rank
NMIEX
EPDPX
NMIEX vs. EPDPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Northern Active M International Equity Fund (NMIEX) and EuroPac International Dividend Income Fund Class A (EPDPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| NMIEX | EPDPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.25 | 2.78 | -1.53 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.72 | 3.30 | -1.59 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.53 | -0.27 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.32 | 4.04 | -2.73 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.38 | 16.67 | -11.29 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NMIEX | EPDPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.25 | 2.78 | -1.53 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.53 | 1.03 | -0.51 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.55 | 0.65 | -0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.27 | 0.44 | -0.17 |
Correlation
The correlation between NMIEX and EPDPX is 0.76, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
NMIEX vs. EPDPX - Dividend Comparison
NMIEX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.72%, more than EPDPX's 5.83% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NMIEX Northern Active M International Equity Fund | 10.72% | 10.43% | 14.92% | 6.95% | 1.53% | 10.42% | 0.80% | 5.83% | 6.65% | 1.34% | 1.73% | 0.75% |
EPDPX EuroPac International Dividend Income Fund Class A | 5.83% | 6.55% | 3.82% | 3.08% | 2.56% | 2.07% | 1.70% | 2.43% | 2.66% | 2.69% | 2.24% | 3.58% |
Drawdowns
NMIEX vs. EPDPX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NMIEX drawdown since its inception was -55.92%, which is greater than EPDPX's maximum drawdown of -39.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NMIEX and EPDPX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| NMIEX | EPDPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.92% | -39.21% | -16.71% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.08% | -10.96% | -1.12% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.54% | -21.06% | -10.48% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.63% | -33.34% | -3.29% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.08% | -9.40% | -2.68% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.97% | -11.30% | -1.67% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.32% | 2.66% | +0.66% |
Volatility
NMIEX vs. EPDPX - Volatility Comparison
Northern Active M International Equity Fund (NMIEX) and EuroPac International Dividend Income Fund Class A (EPDPX) have volatilities of 6.47% and 6.49%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| NMIEX | EPDPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.47% | 6.49% | -0.02% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.88% | 11.41% | -0.53% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.60% | 16.13% | +0.47% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.11% | 14.03% | +2.08% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.83% | 14.86% | +1.97% |