PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NMB vs. MFLX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NMB vs. MFLX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Simplify National Muni Bond ETF (NMB) and First Trust Flexible Municipal High Income ETF (MFLX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NMB achieves a 1.19% return, which is significantly lower than MFLX's 3.33% return.


NMB

1D
-0.28%
1M
1.26%
YTD
1.19%
6M
0.91%
1Y
5.78%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

MFLX

1D
-0.06%
1M
1.21%
YTD
3.33%
6M
3.84%
1Y
9.22%
3Y*
5.48%
5Y*
-0.03%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NMB vs. MFLX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
NMB
Simplify National Muni Bond ETF
1.19%7.97%-1.90%
MFLX
First Trust Flexible Municipal High Income ETF
3.33%3.94%-1.27%

Correlation

The correlation between NMB and MFLX is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.42

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 11, 2024

0.41

NMB vs. MFLX - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
NMB
MFLX

Financial Services

5.7%
15.2%

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Financial Services

NMB
5.7%
MFLX
15.2%

Basic Materials

NMB

-

MFLX

-

Communication Services

NMB

-

MFLX

-

Consumer Cyclical

NMB

-

MFLX

-

Consumer Defensive

NMB

-

MFLX

-

Energy

NMB

-

MFLX

-

Healthcare

NMB

-

MFLX

-

Industrials

NMB

-

MFLX

-

Real Estate

NMB

-

MFLX

-

Technology

NMB

-

MFLX

-

Utilities

NMB

-

MFLX

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NMB vs. MFLX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NMB
NMB Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
NMB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NMB Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
NMB Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
NMB Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
NMB Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank

MFLX
MFLX Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
MFLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MFLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
MFLX Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
MFLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
MFLX Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NMB vs. MFLX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Simplify National Muni Bond ETF (NMB) and First Trust Flexible Municipal High Income ETF (MFLX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NMBMFLXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.55

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.38

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.14

1.49

-0.35

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.97

2.97

-2.00

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.96

11.95

-9.99

NMB vs. MFLX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NMB Sharpe Ratio is 0.72, which is lower than the MFLX Sharpe Ratio of 2.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NMB and MFLX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NMBMFLXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.72

2.27

-1.55

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.00

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.32

0.19

+0.13

Drawdowns

NMB vs. MFLX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NMB drawdown since its inception was -13.68%, smaller than the maximum MFLX drawdown of -26.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NMB and MFLX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NMBMFLXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-13.68%

-26.76%

+13.08%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.99%

-3.11%

-2.88%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-8.18%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.88%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.60%

-3.78%

+2.18%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.36%

-8.17%

+4.81%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.96%

0.77%

+2.19%

Volatility

NMB vs. MFLX - Volatility Comparison

Simplify National Muni Bond ETF (NMB) has a higher volatility of 1.74% compared to First Trust Flexible Municipal High Income ETF (MFLX) at 1.41%. This indicates that NMB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MFLX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NMBMFLXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.74%

1.41%

+0.33%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.42%

2.98%

+1.44%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.13%

4.08%

+4.05%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.70%

10.36%

+2.34%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.70%

11.29%

+1.41%

NMB vs. MFLX - Expense Ratio Comparison

NMB has a 0.52% expense ratio, which is lower than MFLX's 0.88% expense ratio.


Dividends

NMB vs. MFLX - Dividend Comparison

NMB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.87%, more than MFLX's 4.08% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
MFLX
First Trust Flexible Municipal High Income ETF
4.08%4.06%3.81%3.65%4.27%3.69%3.21%2.94%3.74%3.80%0.98%
NMB
Simplify National Muni Bond ETF
5.87%4.48%1.13%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


NMB and MFLX have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NMB has higher volatility (1.74%) compared to MFLX (1.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NMB dropped -13.68% vs MFLX's -26.76%.

On 1-year performance, MFLX leads with 9.22% vs 5.78% for NMB. On fees, NMB is cheaper at 0.52% per year. On volatility, MFLX has been the lower-risk option at 1.41%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, MFLX has performed better with a 9.22% return vs 5.78%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

NMB is cheaper with a 0.52% expense ratio, compared with 0.88% for MFLX.

NMB has the higher dividend yield at 5.87%, compared with 4.08% for MFLX.

They also come from different issuers: Simplify and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.52% for NMB and 0.88% for MFLX.

MFLX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.27 vs 0.72), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NMB and MFLX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer