NMAR vs. KFEB

Last updated Jul 14, 2026

NMAR (Innovator Growth-100 Power Buffer ETF - March) and KFEB (Innovator U.S. Small Cap Power Buffer ETF - February) are both Defined Outcome funds from Innovator. NMAR is passively managed, while KFEB is actively managed. Over the past year, NMAR returned 15.71% vs 22.21% for KFEB. A 0.72 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.79% expense ratio.

Performance

NMAR vs. KFEB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator Growth-100 Power Buffer ETF - March (NMAR) and Innovator U.S. Small Cap Power Buffer ETF - February (KFEB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NMAR achieves a 8.64% return, which is significantly lower than KFEB's 13.34% return.

NMAR

• 1D: -0.54%
• 1M: 0.22%
• 6M: 8.01%
• YTD: 8.64%
• 1Y: 15.71%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

KFEB

• 1D: -0.32%
• 1M: 0.85%
• 6M: 7.72%
• YTD: 13.34%
• 1Y: 22.21%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NMAR vs. KFEB - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
NMAR Innovator Growth-100 Power Buffer ETF - March	8.64%	11.79%
KFEB Innovator U.S. Small Cap Power Buffer ETF - February	13.34%	10.83%

Correlation

The correlation between NMAR and KFEB is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.67
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 3, 2025	0.72

The correlation between NMAR and KFEB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.67 to 0.72 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

NMAR vs. KFEB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NMAR

NMAR Risk / Return Rank: 90
NMAR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 90
NMAR Sortino Ratio Rank: 92
NMAR Omega Ratio Rank: 92
NMAR Calmar Ratio Rank: 84
NMAR Martin Ratio Rank: 94

KFEB

KFEB Risk / Return Rank: 83
KFEB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 81
KFEB Sortino Ratio Rank: 84
KFEB Omega Ratio Rank: 77
KFEB Calmar Ratio Rank: 86
KFEB Martin Ratio Rank: 86

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NMAR vs. KFEB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Growth-100 Power Buffer ETF - March (NMAR) and Innovator U.S. Small Cap Power Buffer ETF - February (KFEB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	NMAR	KFEB	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.39	2.05	+0.34
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.50	2.99	+0.51
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.49	1.36	+0.13
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.61	3.85	-0.23
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	21.63	14.04	+7.59

NMAR vs. KFEB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NMAR Sharpe Ratio is 2.39, which is comparable to the KFEB Sharpe Ratio of 2.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NMAR and KFEB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

NMAR vs. KFEB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NMAR drawdown since its inception was -10.61%, smaller than the maximum KFEB drawdown of -14.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NMAR and KFEB.

Drawdown Indicators

	NMAR	KFEB	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-10.61%	-14.16%	+3.55%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-4.37%	-5.80%	+1.43%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.67%	-0.64%	-0.03%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.87%	-2.18%	+1.31%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.73%	1.59%	-0.86%

Volatility

NMAR vs. KFEB - Volatility Comparison

Innovator Growth-100 Power Buffer ETF - March (NMAR) has a higher volatility of 2.44% compared to Innovator U.S. Small Cap Power Buffer ETF - February (KFEB) at 1.93%. This indicates that NMAR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than KFEB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	NMAR	KFEB	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.44%	1.93%	+0.51%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	5.70%	7.36%	-1.66%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	6.62%	10.92%	-4.30%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	11.09%	12.95%	-1.86%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	11.09%	12.95%	-1.86%

NMAR vs. KFEB - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both NMAR and KFEB have an expense ratio of 0.79%.

Dividends

NMAR vs. KFEB - Dividend Comparison

Neither NMAR nor KFEB has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both NMAR and KFEB in my portfolio?

NMAR and KFEB have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, NMAR or KFEB?

NMAR has higher volatility (2.44%) compared to KFEB (1.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NMAR dropped -10.61% vs KFEB's -14.16%.

Which ETF is better, NMAR or KFEB?

On 1-year performance, KFEB leads with 22.21% vs 15.71% for NMAR. Both ETFs have the same 0.79% expense ratio. On volatility, KFEB has been the lower-risk option at 1.93%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, NMAR or KFEB?

Over the 1-year period, KFEB has performed better with a 22.21% return vs 15.71%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, NMAR or KFEB?

NMAR and KFEB have the same expense ratio: 0.79% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, NMAR or KFEB?

NMAR and KFEB have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

NMAR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.39 vs 2.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.