NLSI vs. ELFY
NLSI (Neos Long/Short Equity Income ETF) and ELFY (ALPS Electrification Infrastructure ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - NLSI is a Long-Short fund actively managed by Neos, while ELFY is a Utilities Equities fund tracking the Ladenburg Thalmann Electrification Infrastructure Index. NLSI is actively managed, while ELFY is passively managed. At a correlation of -0.08, they often move in opposite directions. NLSI charges 2.89%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for ELFY.
Performance
NLSI vs. ELFY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NLSI achieves a 4.88% return, which is significantly lower than ELFY's 18.09% return.
NLSI
- 1D
- -0.32%
- 1M
- 5.21%
- 6M
- 9.82%
- YTD
- 4.88%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ELFY
- 1D
- -0.45%
- 1M
- -5.88%
- 6M
- 10.01%
- YTD
- 18.09%
- 1Y
- 27.99%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NLSI vs. ELFY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
NLSI Neos Long/Short Equity Income ETF | 4.88% | 2.51% |
ELFY ALPS Electrification Infrastructure ETF | 18.09% | -2.17% |
Correlation
The correlation between NLSI and ELFY is -0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 10, 2025 | -0.08 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NLSI vs. ELFY — Risk / Return Rank
NLSI
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
ELFY
NLSI vs. ELFY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Neos Long/Short Equity Income ETF (NLSI) and ALPS Electrification Infrastructure ETF (ELFY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| NLSI | ELFY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.24 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 3.08 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 8.93 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
NLSI vs. ELFY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NLSI drawdown since its inception was -13.82%, which is greater than ELFY's maximum drawdown of -9.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NLSI and ELFY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NLSI | ELFY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -13.82% | -9.12% | -4.70% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -9.12% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.30% | -9.12% | +5.82% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.78% | -1.86% | -3.92% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 3.14% | — |
Volatility
NLSI vs. ELFY - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NLSI | ELFY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 6.34% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 16.44% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.30% | 20.13% | -0.83% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.30% | 19.76% | -0.46% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.30% | 19.76% | -0.46% |
NLSI vs. ELFY - Expense Ratio Comparison
NLSI has a 2.89% expense ratio, which is higher than ELFY's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
NLSI vs. ELFY - Dividend Comparison
NLSI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.91%, more than ELFY's 1.04% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
ELFY ALPS Electrification Infrastructure ETF | 1.04% | 0.76% |
NLSI Neos Long/Short Equity Income ETF | 2.91% | 0.46% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NLSI and ELFY have a correlation of -0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ELFY is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ELFY is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 2.89% for NLSI.
NLSI has the higher dividend yield at 2.91%, compared with 1.04% for ELFY.
NLSI is categorized as Long-Short, while ELFY is Utilities Equities. They also come from different issuers: Neos and ALPS. Their fees differ too: 2.89% for NLSI and 0.50% for ELFY.
Find the right allocation for NLSI and ELFY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer