NLSI vs. DEW
NLSI (Neos Long/Short Equity Income ETF) and DEW (WisdomTree Global High Dividend Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - NLSI is a Long-Short fund actively managed by Neos, while DEW is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the WisdomTree Global High Dividend Index. NLSI is actively managed, while DEW is passively managed. At a correlation of -0.11, they often move in opposite directions. NLSI charges 2.89%/yr vs 0.58%/yr for DEW.
Performance
NLSI vs. DEW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NLSI achieves a 6.57% return, which is significantly lower than DEW's 15.48% return.
NLSI
- 1D
- 0.06%
- 1M
- 5.39%
- 6M
- 6.88%
- YTD
- 6.57%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DEW
- 1D
- 0.51%
- 1M
- 1.08%
- 6M
- 13.81%
- YTD
- 15.48%
- 1Y
- 24.94%
- 3Y*
- 19.18%
- 5Y*
- 12.03%
- 10Y*
- 9.34%
NLSI vs. DEW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
NLSI Neos Long/Short Equity Income ETF | 6.57% | 2.51% |
DEW WisdomTree Global High Dividend Fund | 15.48% | 1.85% |
Correlation
The correlation between NLSI and DEW is -0.11, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 10, 2025 | -0.11 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NLSI vs. DEW — Risk / Return Rank
NLSI
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
DEW
NLSI vs. DEW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Neos Long/Short Equity Income ETF (NLSI) and WisdomTree Global High Dividend Fund (DEW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| NLSI | DEW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.44 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 3.83 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 15.00 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
NLSI vs. DEW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NLSI drawdown since its inception was -13.82%, smaller than the maximum DEW drawdown of -65.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NLSI and DEW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NLSI | DEW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -13.82% | -65.55% | +51.73% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -6.34% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -11.80% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -18.86% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -38.77% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.74% | -0.05% | -1.69% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.90% | -12.38% | +6.48% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.62% | — |
Volatility
NLSI vs. DEW - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NLSI | DEW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 2.82% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 7.44% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.27% | 9.76% | +9.51% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.27% | 12.95% | +6.32% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.27% | 15.37% | +3.90% |
NLSI vs. DEW - Expense Ratio Comparison
NLSI has a 2.89% expense ratio, which is higher than DEW's 0.58% expense ratio.
Dividends
NLSI vs. DEW - Dividend Comparison
NLSI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.87%, less than DEW's 3.22% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DEW WisdomTree Global High Dividend Fund | 3.22% | 3.71% | 4.02% | 4.55% | 3.82% | 3.55% | 4.10% | 3.74% | 4.17% | 3.18% | 3.42% | 4.32% |
NLSI Neos Long/Short Equity Income ETF | 2.87% | 0.46% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NLSI and DEW have a correlation of -0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, DEW is cheaper at 0.58% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
DEW is cheaper with a 0.58% expense ratio, compared with 2.89% for NLSI.
DEW has the higher dividend yield at 3.22%, compared with 2.87% for NLSI.
NLSI is categorized as Long-Short, while DEW is Large Cap Value Equities. They also come from different issuers: Neos and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 2.89% for NLSI and 0.58% for DEW.
Find the right allocation for NLSI and DEW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer