NJTFX vs. ALCAX
NJTFX (T. Rowe Price New Jersey Tax Free Bond Fund) and ALCAX (AB Municipal Income Fund California Portfolio) are both Municipal Bonds funds. Over the past 10 years, NJTFX returned 2.38%/yr vs 2.06%/yr for ALCAX. A 0.78 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. NJTFX charges 0.56%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for ALCAX.
Performance
NJTFX vs. ALCAX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NJTFX achieves a 2.03% return, which is significantly higher than ALCAX's 1.52% return. Over the past 10 years, NJTFX has outperformed ALCAX with an annualized return of 2.38%, while ALCAX has yielded a comparatively lower 2.06% annualized return.
NJTFX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 1.62%
- YTD
- 2.03%
- 6M
- 2.72%
- 1Y
- 9.01%
- 3Y*
- 4.77%
- 5Y*
- 1.57%
- 10Y*
- 2.38%
ALCAX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 1.46%
- YTD
- 1.52%
- 6M
- 2.00%
- 1Y
- 6.57%
- 3Y*
- 4.18%
- 5Y*
- 1.17%
- 10Y*
- 2.06%
NJTFX vs. ALCAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NJTFX T. Rowe Price New Jersey Tax Free Bond Fund | 2.03% | 5.00% | 4.01% | 7.17% | -10.24% | 2.67% | 4.73% | 6.65% | 1.31% | 5.30% |
ALCAX AB Municipal Income Fund California Portfolio | 1.52% | 4.84% | 2.41% | 6.38% | -8.98% | 1.71% | 4.86% | 7.05% | 0.54% | 5.54% |
Correlation
The correlation between NJTFX and ALCAX is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 30, 1991 | 0.78 |
The correlation between NJTFX and ALCAX shifts across timeframes, from 0.76 (1 year) to 0.88 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NJTFX vs. ALCAX — Risk / Return Rank
NJTFX
ALCAX
NJTFX vs. ALCAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price New Jersey Tax Free Bond Fund (NJTFX) and AB Municipal Income Fund California Portfolio (ALCAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| NJTFX | ALCAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.95 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.61 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.89 | 1.60 | +0.29 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.45 | 2.24 | +1.21 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.05 | 7.31 | +5.74 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
NJTFX vs. ALCAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NJTFX drawdown since its inception was -15.19%, roughly equal to the maximum ALCAX drawdown of -14.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NJTFX and ALCAX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NJTFX | ALCAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -15.19% | -14.67% | -0.52% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.59% | -2.90% | +0.31% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -5.69% | -5.05% | -0.64% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -15.19% | -14.31% | -0.88% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -15.19% | -14.31% | -0.88% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.09% | -0.65% | +0.56% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.81% | -1.79% | -0.02% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.68% | 0.89% | -0.21% |
Volatility
NJTFX vs. ALCAX - Volatility Comparison
T. Rowe Price New Jersey Tax Free Bond Fund (NJTFX) and AB Municipal Income Fund California Portfolio (ALCAX) have volatilities of 0.71% and 0.73%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NJTFX | ALCAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.71% | 0.73% | -0.02% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.96% | 2.02% | -0.06% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.66% | 2.70% | -0.04% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.99% | 3.84% | +0.15% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.86% | 3.84% | +0.02% |
NJTFX vs. ALCAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
NJTFX has a 0.56% expense ratio, which is lower than ALCAX's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
NJTFX vs. ALCAX - Dividend Comparison
NJTFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.44%, more than ALCAX's 3.34% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ALCAX AB Municipal Income Fund California Portfolio | 3.34% | 4.38% | 3.15% | 2.84% | 2.43% | 1.61% | 2.74% | 3.35% | 3.63% | 3.21% | 3.38% | 3.37% |
NJTFX T. Rowe Price New Jersey Tax Free Bond Fund | 4.44% | 4.44% | 4.27% | 3.27% | 2.03% | 2.56% | 2.79% | 2.84% | 3.13% | 3.13% | 3.26% | 3.36% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NJTFX and ALCAX have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ALCAX has higher volatility (0.73%) compared to NJTFX (0.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NJTFX dropped -15.19% vs ALCAX's -14.67%.
NJTFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.36 vs 2.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for NJTFX and ALCAX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer