NJNK vs. XB
NJNK (Columbia U.S. High Yield ETF) and XB (BondBloxx B Rated USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF) are both High Yield Bonds funds. NJNK is actively managed, while XB is passively managed. Over the past year, NJNK returned 6.93% vs 7.35% for XB. Their correlation of 0.81 suggests significant overlap in exposure. NJNK charges 0.46%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for XB.
Performance
NJNK vs. XB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NJNK achieves a 1.32% return, which is significantly lower than XB's 1.82% return.
NJNK
- 1D
- -0.32%
- 1M
- 0.28%
- YTD
- 1.32%
- 6M
- 1.46%
- 1Y
- 6.93%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XB
- 1D
- -0.31%
- 1M
- 0.57%
- YTD
- 1.82%
- 6M
- 2.29%
- 1Y
- 7.35%
- 3Y*
- 8.35%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NJNK vs. XB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
NJNK Columbia U.S. High Yield ETF | 1.32% | 9.03% | 0.62% |
XB BondBloxx B Rated USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF | 1.82% | 7.81% | 1.22% |
Correlation
The correlation between NJNK and XB is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 6, 2024 | 0.81 |
The correlation between NJNK and XB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.81 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NJNK vs. XB — Risk / Return Rank
NJNK
XB
NJNK vs. XB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia U.S. High Yield ETF (NJNK) and BondBloxx B Rated USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (XB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| NJNK | XB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.74 | 1.98 | -0.23 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.64 | 3.05 | -0.40 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.39 | -0.06 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.64 | 3.42 | -0.78 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.97 | 15.02 | -4.04 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NJNK | XB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.74 | 1.98 | -0.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.31 | 0.84 | +0.47 |
Drawdowns
NJNK vs. XB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NJNK drawdown since its inception was -4.48%, smaller than the maximum XB drawdown of -9.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NJNK and XB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NJNK | XB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -4.48% | -9.25% | +4.77% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.63% | -2.16% | -0.47% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -5.36% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.32% | -0.47% | +0.15% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.50% | -1.32% | +0.82% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.63% | 0.49% | +0.14% |
Volatility
NJNK vs. XB - Volatility Comparison
Columbia U.S. High Yield ETF (NJNK) and BondBloxx B Rated USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (XB) have volatilities of 1.42% and 1.36%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NJNK | XB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.42% | 1.36% | +0.06% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.10% | 2.97% | +0.13% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.00% | 3.74% | +0.26% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.80% | 7.44% | -2.64% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.80% | 7.44% | -2.64% |
NJNK vs. XB - Expense Ratio Comparison
NJNK has a 0.46% expense ratio, which is higher than XB's 0.30% expense ratio.
Dividends
NJNK vs. XB - Dividend Comparison
NJNK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.44%, less than XB's 7.08% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NJNK Columbia U.S. High Yield ETF | 6.44% | 6.34% | 2.05% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XB BondBloxx B Rated USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF | 7.08% | 6.96% | 7.74% | 7.87% | 5.01% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NJNK and XB have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NJNK has higher volatility (1.42%) compared to XB (1.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NJNK dropped -4.48% vs XB's -9.25%.
On 1-year performance, XB leads with 7.35% vs 6.93% for NJNK. On fees, XB is cheaper at 0.30% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, XB has performed better with a 7.35% return vs 6.93%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XB is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.46% for NJNK.
XB has the higher dividend yield at 7.08%, compared with 6.44% for NJNK.
They also come from different issuers: Columbia and BondBloxx. Their fees differ too: 0.46% for NJNK and 0.30% for XB.
XB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.98 vs 1.74), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for NJNK and XB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer