NJNK vs. BSJQ
NJNK (Columbia U.S. High Yield ETF) and BSJQ (Invesco BulletShares 2026 High Yield Corp Bond ETF) are both High Yield Bonds funds. NJNK is actively managed, while BSJQ is passively managed. Over the past year, NJNK returned 6.93% vs 4.62% for BSJQ. A 0.73 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. NJNK charges 0.46%/yr vs 0.42%/yr for BSJQ.
Performance
NJNK vs. BSJQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NJNK achieves a 1.32% return, which is significantly higher than BSJQ's 0.85% return.
NJNK
- 1D
- -0.32%
- 1M
- 0.28%
- YTD
- 1.32%
- 6M
- 1.46%
- 1Y
- 6.93%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BSJQ
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -0.28%
- YTD
- 0.85%
- 6M
- 1.28%
- 1Y
- 4.62%
- 3Y*
- 6.94%
- 5Y*
- 3.74%
- 10Y*
- —
NJNK vs. BSJQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
NJNK Columbia U.S. High Yield ETF | 1.32% | 9.03% | 0.62% |
BSJQ Invesco BulletShares 2026 High Yield Corp Bond ETF | 0.85% | 6.59% | 1.59% |
Correlation
The correlation between NJNK and BSJQ is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 6, 2024 | 0.73 |
The correlation between NJNK and BSJQ shifts across timeframes, from 0.60 (1 year) to 0.73 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NJNK vs. BSJQ — Risk / Return Rank
NJNK
BSJQ
NJNK vs. BSJQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia U.S. High Yield ETF (NJNK) and Invesco BulletShares 2026 High Yield Corp Bond ETF (BSJQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| NJNK | BSJQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.61 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.60 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.76 | -0.43 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.64 | 8.57 | -5.93 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.97 | 41.55 | -30.58 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NJNK | BSJQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.74 | 3.35 | -1.61 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.66 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.31 | 0.54 | +0.77 |
Drawdowns
NJNK vs. BSJQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NJNK drawdown since its inception was -4.48%, smaller than the maximum BSJQ drawdown of -24.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NJNK and BSJQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NJNK | BSJQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -4.48% | -24.13% | +19.65% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.63% | -0.54% | -2.09% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -2.66% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -11.95% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.32% | -0.43% | +0.11% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.50% | -2.17% | +1.67% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.63% | 0.11% | +0.52% |
Volatility
NJNK vs. BSJQ - Volatility Comparison
Columbia U.S. High Yield ETF (NJNK) has a higher volatility of 1.42% compared to Invesco BulletShares 2026 High Yield Corp Bond ETF (BSJQ) at 0.54%. This indicates that NJNK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BSJQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NJNK | BSJQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.42% | 0.54% | +0.88% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.10% | 0.98% | +2.12% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.00% | 1.38% | +2.62% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.80% | 5.73% | -0.93% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.80% | 8.45% | -3.65% |
NJNK vs. BSJQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
NJNK has a 0.46% expense ratio, which is higher than BSJQ's 0.42% expense ratio.
Dividends
NJNK vs. BSJQ - Dividend Comparison
NJNK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.44%, more than BSJQ's 5.83% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BSJQ Invesco BulletShares 2026 High Yield Corp Bond ETF | 5.83% | 6.10% | 6.58% | 6.58% | 5.58% | 4.27% | 4.64% | 4.59% | 2.39% |
NJNK Columbia U.S. High Yield ETF | 6.44% | 6.34% | 2.05% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NJNK and BSJQ have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NJNK has higher volatility (1.42%) compared to BSJQ (0.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NJNK dropped -4.48% vs BSJQ's -24.13%.
On 1-year performance, NJNK leads with 6.93% vs 4.62% for BSJQ. On fees, BSJQ is cheaper at 0.42% per year. On volatility, BSJQ has been the lower-risk option at 0.54%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, NJNK has performed better with a 6.93% return vs 4.62%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BSJQ is cheaper with a 0.42% expense ratio, compared with 0.46% for NJNK.
NJNK has the higher dividend yield at 6.44%, compared with 5.83% for BSJQ.
They also come from different issuers: Columbia and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.46% for NJNK and 0.42% for BSJQ.
BSJQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.35 vs 1.74), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for NJNK and BSJQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer