PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NIOG vs. CCUP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NIOG vs. CCUP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 2X Long NIO Daily ETF (NIOG) and T-REX 2X Long CRCL Daily Target ETF (CCUP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NIOG achieves a 5.09% return, which is significantly higher than CCUP's -20.97% return.


NIOG

1D
-8.37%
1M
-14.00%
YTD
5.09%
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

CCUP

1D
-20.05%
1M
-47.47%
YTD
-20.97%
6M
-36.36%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NIOG vs. CCUP - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between NIOG and CCUP is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 19, 2025

0.18

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NIOG vs. CCUP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long NIO Daily ETF (NIOG) and T-REX 2X Long CRCL Daily Target ETF (CCUP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

NIOG vs. CCUP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NIOGCCUPDifference

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.21

-0.47

+0.68

Drawdowns

NIOG vs. CCUP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NIOG drawdown since its inception was -45.19%, smaller than the maximum CCUP drawdown of -93.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NIOG and CCUP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NIOGCCUPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-45.19%

-93.74%

+48.55%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-34.15%

-86.98%

+52.83%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-19.65%

-69.18%

+49.53%

Volatility

NIOG vs. CCUP - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NIOGCCUPDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

120.05%

197.62%

-77.57%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

120.05%

197.62%

-77.57%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

120.05%

197.62%

-77.57%

NIOG vs. CCUP - Expense Ratio Comparison

NIOG has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than CCUP's 1.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

NIOG vs. CCUP - Dividend Comparison

Neither NIOG nor CCUP has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


NIOG and CCUP have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, NIOG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

NIOG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for CCUP.

NIOG and CCUP have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and T-Rex. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for NIOG and 1.50% for CCUP.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NIOG and CCUP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer