NIO vs. GBPG.L
NIO (NIO Inc.) is a stock, while GBPG.L (Goldman Sachs Access UK Gilts 1-10 Years UCITS ETF Class GBP (Dist)) is European Government Bonds fund tracking the FTSE Act UK Cnvt Gilts All Stocks TR GBP. Over the past 3 years, NIO returned -16.32%/yr vs 6.35%/yr for GBPG.L. At a 0.18 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
NIO vs. GBPG.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
NIO is traded in USD, while GBPG.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the GBPG.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NIO achieves a 2.16% return, which is significantly lower than GBPG.L's 2.95% return.
NIO
- 1D
- -0.38%
- 1M
- -14.59%
- YTD
- 2.16%
- 6M
- 3.58%
- 1Y
- 48.43%
- 3Y*
- -16.32%
- 5Y*
- -35.22%
- 10Y*
- —
GBPG.L
- 1D
- 0.12%
- 1M
- 1.02%
- YTD
- 2.95%
- 6M
- 0.82%
- 1Y
- 1.63%
- 3Y*
- 6.35%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NIO vs. GBPG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NIO NIO Inc. | 2.16% | 16.97% | -51.93% | -6.97% | -69.22% | -21.53% |
GBPG.L Goldman Sachs Access UK Gilts 1-10 Years UCITS ETF Class GBP (Dist) | 2.95% | 9.95% | -1.50% | 9.78% | -18.86% | -2.95% |
Correlation
The correlation between NIO and GBPG.L is 0.10, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.10 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 7, 2021 | 0.18 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NIO vs. GBPG.L — Risk / Return Rank
NIO
GBPG.L
NIO vs. GBPG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NIO Inc. (NIO) and Goldman Sachs Access UK Gilts 1-10 Years UCITS ETF Class GBP (Dist) (GBPG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| NIO | GBPG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.61 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.23 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 1.02 | +0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.01 | 0.15 | +0.86 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.78 | 0.34 | +1.44 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
NIO vs. GBPG.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NIO drawdown since its inception was -95.00%, which is greater than GBPG.L's maximum drawdown of -34.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NIO and GBPG.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NIO | GBPG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -95.00% | -34.02% | -60.98% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -43.73% | -5.89% | -37.84% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -79.69% | -11.44% | -68.25% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -94.10% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -91.71% | -3.96% | -87.75% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -67.90% | -12.52% | -55.38% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 24.74% | 2.59% | +22.15% |
Volatility
NIO vs. GBPG.L - Volatility Comparison
NIO Inc. (NIO) has a higher volatility of 17.58% compared to Goldman Sachs Access UK Gilts 1-10 Years UCITS ETF Class GBP (Dist) (GBPG.L) at 2.47%. This indicates that NIO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GBPG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NIO | GBPG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 17.58% | 2.47% | +15.11% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 41.08% | 7.65% | +33.43% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 62.74% | 9.53% | +53.21% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 71.62% | 10.74% | +60.88% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 86.66% | 10.74% | +75.92% |
Dividends
NIO vs. GBPG.L - Dividend Comparison
NIO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GBPG.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.08%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GBPG.L Goldman Sachs Access UK Gilts 1-10 Years UCITS ETF Class GBP (Dist) | 4.08% | 4.13% | 4.10% | 3.35% | 0.63% |
NIO NIO Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NIO and GBPG.L have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for NIO and GBPG.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer