PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NIO vs. CAT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

NIO vs. CAT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in NIO Inc. (NIO) and Caterpillar Inc. (CAT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NIO achieves a 5.10% return, which is significantly lower than CAT's 58.52% return.


NIO

1D
-5.80%
1M
-9.15%
YTD
5.10%
6M
6.35%
1Y
48.07%
3Y*
-12.05%
5Y*
-33.73%
10Y*

CAT

1D
-3.85%
1M
-2.44%
YTD
58.52%
6M
50.56%
1Y
161.94%
3Y*
61.01%
5Y*
32.30%
10Y*
30.90%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NIO vs. CAT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
NIO
NIO Inc.
5.10%16.97%-51.93%-6.97%-69.22%-35.00%1,112.44%-36.89%-3.48%
CAT
Caterpillar Inc.
58.52%60.30%24.66%25.95%18.60%15.95%26.97%19.51%-11.37%

Correlation

The correlation between NIO and CAT is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.15

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.24

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.26

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 13, 2018

0.26

The correlation between NIO and CAT shifts across timeframes, from 0.15 (1 year) to 0.26 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

NIO:

$13.30B

CAT:

$421.21B

EPS

NIO:

-$3.74

CAT:

$20.07

PS Ratio

NIO:

0.13

CAT:

6.00

PB Ratio

NIO:

3.06

CAT:

22.57

Total Revenue (TTM)

NIO:

$100.51B

CAT:

$70.76B

Gross Profit (TTM)

NIO:

$15.77B

CAT:

$23.01B

EBITDA (TTM)

NIO:

-$7.54B

CAT:

$15.31B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NIO vs. CAT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NIO
NIO Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
NIO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NIO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
NIO Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
NIO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
NIO Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank

CAT
CAT Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
CAT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CAT Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
CAT Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
CAT Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
CAT Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NIO vs. CAT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NIO Inc. (NIO) and Caterpillar Inc. (CAT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NIOCATDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-3.99

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.93

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

1.69

-0.52

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.10

11.74

-10.64

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.98

38.98

-37.00

NIO vs. CAT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NIO Sharpe Ratio is 0.77, which is lower than the CAT Sharpe Ratio of 4.76. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NIO and CAT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NIOCATDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.77

4.76

-3.99

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.47

1.06

-1.53

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.00

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.03

0.35

-0.38

Drawdowns

NIO vs. CAT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NIO drawdown since its inception was -95.00%, which is greater than CAT's maximum drawdown of -73.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NIO and CAT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NIOCATDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-95.00%

-73.43%

-21.57%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-43.73%

-13.88%

-29.85%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-79.69%

-34.05%

-45.64%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-94.10%

-34.05%

-60.05%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.36%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-91.47%

-3.85%

-87.62%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-67.88%

-19.74%

-48.14%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

24.39%

4.17%

+20.22%

Volatility

NIO vs. CAT - Volatility Comparison

NIO Inc. (NIO) has a higher volatility of 19.56% compared to Caterpillar Inc. (CAT) at 11.26%. This indicates that NIO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CAT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NIOCATDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

19.56%

11.26%

+8.30%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

41.15%

27.35%

+13.80%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

62.99%

34.24%

+28.75%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

71.69%

30.67%

+41.02%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

86.71%

30.88%

+55.83%

Dividends

NIO vs. CAT - Dividend Comparison

NIO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CAT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.67%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CAT
Caterpillar Inc.
0.67%1.02%1.49%1.69%1.93%2.07%2.26%2.56%2.58%1.97%3.32%4.33%
NIO
NIO Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

NIO vs. CAT - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between NIO Inc. and Caterpillar Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


10.00B15.00B20.00B25.00B30.00B35.00B20222023202420252026
25.53B
17.42B
(NIO) Total Revenue
(CAT) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

NIO vs. CAT - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between NIO Inc. and Caterpillar Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%10.0%20.0%30.0%40.0%20222023202420252026
19.0%
35.1%
Portfolio components
NIO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, NIO Inc. reported a gross profit of 4.86B and revenue of 25.53B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 19.0%.

CAT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Caterpillar Inc. reported a gross profit of 6.11B and revenue of 17.42B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 35.1%.

NIO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, NIO Inc. reported an operating income of -308.81M and revenue of 25.53B, resulting in an operating margin of -1.2%.

CAT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Caterpillar Inc. reported an operating income of 3.09B and revenue of 17.42B, resulting in an operating margin of 17.7%.

NIO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, NIO Inc. reported a net income of -496.01M and revenue of 25.53B, resulting in a net margin of -1.9%.

CAT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Caterpillar Inc. reported a net income of 2.55B and revenue of 17.42B, resulting in a net margin of 14.6%.


Frequently Asked Questions


NIO and CAT have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NIO has higher volatility (19.56%) compared to CAT (11.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NIO dropped -95.00% vs CAT's -73.43%.

CAT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.76 vs 0.77), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NIO and CAT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer