PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NILTX vs. SWRLX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NILTX vs. SWRLX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Neuberger Berman International Select Fund (NILTX) and Touchstone International Equity Fund (SWRLX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NILTX achieves a 6.50% return, which is significantly lower than SWRLX's 20.95% return. Over the past 10 years, NILTX has underperformed SWRLX with an annualized return of 6.58%, while SWRLX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.62% annualized return.


NILTX

1D
0.56%
1M
0.81%
YTD
6.50%
6M
4.18%
1Y
4.78%
3Y*
11.03%
5Y*
2.60%
10Y*
6.58%

SWRLX

1D
-0.16%
1M
2.53%
YTD
20.95%
6M
25.12%
1Y
48.70%
3Y*
24.72%
5Y*
12.02%
10Y*
10.62%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NILTX vs. SWRLX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NILTX
Neuberger Berman International Select Fund
6.50%16.45%4.16%14.28%-25.27%14.02%15.00%26.12%-15.14%27.25%
SWRLX
Touchstone International Equity Fund
20.95%53.78%-1.53%17.63%-11.02%3.86%7.47%25.87%-16.81%27.24%

Correlation

The correlation between NILTX and SWRLX is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.83

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.84

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.86

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.87

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 3, 2006

0.90

The correlation between NILTX and SWRLX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NILTX vs. SWRLX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NILTX
NILTX Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
NILTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NILTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
NILTX Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
NILTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
NILTX Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank

SWRLX
SWRLX Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
SWRLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SWRLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
SWRLX Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
SWRLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
SWRLX Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NILTX vs. SWRLX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Neuberger Berman International Select Fund (NILTX) and Touchstone International Equity Fund (SWRLX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NILTXSWRLXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-3.16

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.97

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.07

1.64

-0.57

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.37

4.29

-3.92

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.14

16.08

-14.94

NILTX vs. SWRLX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NILTX Sharpe Ratio is 0.30, which is lower than the SWRLX Sharpe Ratio of 3.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NILTX and SWRLX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NILTXSWRLXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.30

3.46

-3.16

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.16

0.70

-0.54

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.39

0.63

-0.24

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.24

0.41

-0.17

Drawdowns

NILTX vs. SWRLX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NILTX drawdown since its inception was -58.23%, roughly equal to the maximum SWRLX drawdown of -59.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NILTX and SWRLX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NILTXSWRLXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-58.23%

-59.44%

+1.21%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.64%

-11.49%

-2.15%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.35%

-14.08%

-1.27%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.90%

-34.19%

-0.71%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.90%

-35.95%

+1.05%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.28%

-1.02%

-0.26%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.66%

-11.62%

-2.04%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.34%

3.06%

+1.28%

Volatility

NILTX vs. SWRLX - Volatility Comparison

Neuberger Berman International Select Fund (NILTX) and Touchstone International Equity Fund (SWRLX) have volatilities of 4.65% and 4.81%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NILTXSWRLXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.65%

4.81%

-0.16%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.08%

11.79%

+2.29%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.63%

14.25%

+2.38%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.85%

17.38%

-0.53%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.05%

16.85%

+0.20%

NILTX vs. SWRLX - Expense Ratio Comparison

NILTX has a 1.19% expense ratio, which is lower than SWRLX's 1.37% expense ratio.


Dividends

NILTX vs. SWRLX - Dividend Comparison

NILTX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SWRLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.31%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NILTX
Neuberger Berman International Select Fund
0.00%0.00%2.96%2.53%0.88%10.94%1.11%2.80%1.68%0.78%1.15%0.89%
SWRLX
Touchstone International Equity Fund
6.31%7.63%10.53%1.36%1.56%14.95%0.46%9.10%15.19%3.61%0.66%3.76%

Frequently Asked Questions


NILTX and SWRLX have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SWRLX has higher volatility (4.81%) compared to NILTX (4.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NILTX dropped -58.23% vs SWRLX's -59.44%.

SWRLX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.46 vs 0.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NILTX and SWRLX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer