NIKL vs. TNGY
NIKL (Sprott Nickel Miners ETF) and TNGY (Tortoise Energy Fund) are both Energy Equities funds. NIKL is passively managed, while TNGY is actively managed. At a 0.06 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. NIKL charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for TNGY.
Performance
NIKL vs. TNGY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NIKL achieves a -7.50% return, which is significantly lower than TNGY's 14.98% return.
NIKL
- 1D
- 0.76%
- 1M
- -13.19%
- YTD
- -7.50%
- 6M
- 4.95%
- 1Y
- 27.58%
- 3Y*
- -3.02%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TNGY
- 1D
- -0.19%
- 1M
- -3.25%
- YTD
- 14.98%
- 6M
- 11.66%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NIKL vs. TNGY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
NIKL Sprott Nickel Miners ETF | -7.50% | 36.88% |
TNGY Tortoise Energy Fund | 14.98% | 1.81% |
Correlation
The correlation between NIKL and TNGY is 0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 17, 2025 | 0.06 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NIKL vs. TNGY — Risk / Return Rank
NIKL
TNGY
NIKL vs. TNGY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sprott Nickel Miners ETF (NIKL) and Tortoise Energy Fund (TNGY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| NIKL | TNGY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.14 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.93 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.23 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NIKL | TNGY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.66 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.10 | 1.14 | -1.24 |
Drawdowns
NIKL vs. TNGY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NIKL drawdown since its inception was -60.23%, which is greater than TNGY's maximum drawdown of -8.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NIKL and TNGY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NIKL | TNGY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -60.23% | -8.86% | -51.37% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -29.87% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -60.23% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -29.33% | -4.10% | -25.23% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -26.58% | -2.18% | -24.40% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 12.42% | — | — |
Volatility
NIKL vs. TNGY - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NIKL | TNGY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 15.35% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 35.55% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 42.12% | 15.67% | +26.45% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 32.60% | 15.67% | +16.93% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 32.60% | 15.67% | +16.93% |
NIKL vs. TNGY - Expense Ratio Comparison
NIKL has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than TNGY's 0.85% expense ratio.
Dividends
NIKL vs. TNGY - Dividend Comparison
NIKL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.73%, less than TNGY's 3.42% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
NIKL Sprott Nickel Miners ETF | 2.73% | 2.53% | 3.49% | 19.52% |
TNGY Tortoise Energy Fund | 3.42% | 2.59% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NIKL and TNGY have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, NIKL is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
NIKL is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for TNGY.
TNGY has the higher dividend yield at 3.42%, compared with 2.73% for NIKL.
They also come from different issuers: Sprott and Tortoise Capital. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for NIKL and 0.85% for TNGY.
Find the right allocation for NIKL and TNGY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer