PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NIKL vs. SPPP
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

NIKL vs. SPPP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Sprott Nickel Miners ETF (NIKL) and Sprott Physical Platinum and Palladium Trust (SPPP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

NIKL vs. SPPP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
NIKL
Sprott Nickel Miners ETF
4.61%52.05%-22.48%-17.88%
SPPP
Sprott Physical Platinum and Palladium Trust
-7.36%89.43%-11.89%-14.49%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NIKL achieves a 4.61% return, which is significantly higher than SPPP's -7.36% return.


NIKL

1D
2.78%
1M
-15.83%
YTD
4.61%
6M
12.89%
1Y
90.01%
3Y*
-1.58%
5Y*
10Y*

SPPP

1D
0.45%
1M
-16.26%
YTD
-7.36%
6M
14.96%
1Y
57.89%
3Y*
8.51%
5Y*
-4.12%
10Y*
9.32%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


NIKL vs. SPPP - Expense Ratio Comparison

NIKL has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than SPPP's 1.02% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

NIKL vs. SPPP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NIKL
NIKL Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
NIKL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NIKL Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
NIKL Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
NIKL Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
NIKL Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank

SPPP
SPPP Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
SPPP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPPP Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPPP Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
SPPP Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPPP Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NIKL vs. SPPP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sprott Nickel Miners ETF (NIKL) and Sprott Physical Platinum and Palladium Trust (SPPP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NIKLSPPPDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.19

1.18

+1.01

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.72

1.59

+1.13

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.24

+0.10

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.03

1.52

+1.51

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

9.50

4.58

+4.92

NIKL vs. SPPP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NIKL Sharpe Ratio is 2.19, which is higher than the SPPP Sharpe Ratio of 1.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NIKL and SPPP, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NIKLSPPPDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.19

1.18

+1.01

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.12

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.28

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.01

0.11

-0.10

Correlation

The correlation between NIKL and SPPP is 0.41, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

NIKL vs. SPPP - Dividend Comparison

NIKL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.42%, while SPPP has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM202520242023
NIKL
Sprott Nickel Miners ETF
2.42%2.53%3.49%19.52%
SPPP
Sprott Physical Platinum and Palladium Trust
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

NIKL vs. SPPP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NIKL drawdown since its inception was -60.23%, roughly equal to the maximum SPPP drawdown of -59.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NIKL and SPPP.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


NIKLSPPPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-60.23%

-59.09%

-1.14%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-29.33%

-37.42%

+8.09%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-59.09%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-59.09%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-20.08%

-30.91%

+10.83%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-27.00%

-26.43%

-0.57%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.35%

12.43%

-3.08%

Volatility

NIKL vs. SPPP - Volatility Comparison

Sprott Nickel Miners ETF (NIKL) has a higher volatility of 16.87% compared to Sprott Physical Platinum and Palladium Trust (SPPP) at 15.09%. This indicates that NIKL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPPP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


NIKLSPPPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

16.87%

15.09%

+1.78%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

33.15%

46.37%

-13.22%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

41.35%

49.37%

-8.02%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

31.74%

34.37%

-2.63%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

31.74%

32.87%

-1.13%