NIKL vs. NBET

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

NIKL (Sprott Nickel Miners ETF) and NBET (Neuberger Berman Energy Transition & Infrastructure ETF) are both Energy Equities funds. NIKL is passively managed, while NBET is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, NIKL returned -3.02%/yr vs 21.02%/yr for NBET. At a 0.27 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. NIKL charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for NBET.

Performance

NIKL vs. NBET - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Sprott Nickel Miners ETF (NIKL) and Neuberger Berman Energy Transition & Infrastructure ETF (NBET). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NIKL achieves a -7.50% return, which is significantly lower than NBET's 24.75% return.

NIKL

• 1D: 0.76%
• 1M: -13.19%
• YTD: -7.50%
• 6M: 4.95%
• 1Y: 27.58%
• 3Y*: -3.02%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

NBET

• 1D: 0.40%
• 1M: -2.36%
• YTD: 24.75%
• 6M: 21.35%
• 1Y: 29.95%
• 3Y*: 21.02%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NIKL vs. NBET - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
NIKL Sprott Nickel Miners ETF	-7.50%	52.05%	-22.48%	-17.88%
NBET Neuberger Berman Energy Transition & Infrastructure ETF	24.75%	5.87%	30.30%	7.60%

Correlation

The correlation between NIKL and NBET is 0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.03
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.26
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 23, 2023	0.27

Over the past year, the correlation between NIKL and NBET has dropped to 0.03 - well below their long-term average of 0.27, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

NIKL vs. NBET - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	NIKL	NBET
Basic Materials	100.0%	0.9%
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	89.0%
Financial Services	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Industrials	-	2.6%
Real Estate	-	-
Technology	-	-
Utilities	-	8.4%

Return for Risk

NIKL vs. NBET — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NIKL

NIKL Risk / Return Rank: 21
NIKL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 20
NIKL Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
NIKL Omega Ratio Rank: 22
NIKL Calmar Ratio Rank: 21
NIKL Martin Ratio Rank: 20

NBET

NBET Risk / Return Rank: 65
NBET Sharpe Ratio Rank: 63
NBET Sortino Ratio Rank: 59
NBET Omega Ratio Rank: 56
NBET Calmar Ratio Rank: 83
NBET Martin Ratio Rank: 64

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NIKL vs. NBET - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sprott Nickel Miners ETF (NIKL) and Neuberger Berman Energy Transition & Infrastructure ETF (NBET). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	NIKL	NBET	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.66	2.08	-1.42
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.17	2.75	-1.58
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.14	1.34	-0.20
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.93	4.40	-3.47
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.23	11.55	-9.32
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

NIKL vs. NBET - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NIKL Sharpe Ratio is 0.66, which is lower than the NBET Sharpe Ratio of 2.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NIKL and NBET, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	NIKL	NBET	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.66	2.08	-1.42
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.10	0.73	-0.84

Drawdowns

NIKL vs. NBET - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NIKL drawdown since its inception was -60.23%, which is greater than NBET's maximum drawdown of -18.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NIKL and NBET.

Drawdown Indicators

	NIKL	NBET	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-60.23%	-18.72%	-41.51%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-29.87%	-6.84%	-23.03%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-60.23%	-18.72%	-41.51%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-29.33%	-3.94%	-25.39%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-26.58%	-5.06%	-21.52%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	12.42%	2.60%	+9.82%

Volatility

NIKL vs. NBET - Volatility Comparison

Sprott Nickel Miners ETF (NIKL) has a higher volatility of 15.35% compared to Neuberger Berman Energy Transition & Infrastructure ETF (NBET) at 5.85%. This indicates that NIKL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NBET based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	NIKL	NBET	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	15.35%	5.85%	+9.50%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	35.55%	11.02%	+24.53%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	42.12%	14.59%	+27.53%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	32.60%	19.54%	+13.06%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	32.60%	19.54%	+13.06%

NIKL vs. NBET - Expense Ratio Comparison

NIKL has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than NBET's 0.65% expense ratio.

Dividends

NIKL vs. NBET - Dividend Comparison

NIKL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.73%, more than NBET's 2.33% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
NBET Neuberger Berman Energy Transition & Infrastructure ETF	2.33%	2.70%	2.43%	1.22%	0.87%
NIKL Sprott Nickel Miners ETF	2.73%	2.53%	3.49%	19.52%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both NIKL and NBET in my portfolio?

NIKL and NBET have a correlation of 0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, NIKL or NBET?

NIKL has higher volatility (15.35%) compared to NBET (5.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NIKL dropped -60.23% vs NBET's -18.72%.

Which ETF is better, NIKL or NBET?

On 3-year performance, NBET leads with 21.02% vs -3.02% for NIKL. On fees, NBET is cheaper at 0.65% per year. On volatility, NBET has been the lower-risk option at 5.85%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, NIKL or NBET?

Over the 3-year period, NBET has performed better with a 21.02% return vs -3.02%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, NIKL or NBET?

NBET is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for NIKL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, NIKL or NBET?

NIKL has the higher dividend yield at 2.73%, compared with 2.33% for NBET.

What is the main difference between NIKL and NBET?

They also come from different issuers: Sprott and Neuberger Berman. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for NIKL and 0.65% for NBET.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

NBET currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.08 vs 0.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.