NIKL vs. INTC

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

NIKL (Sprott Nickel Miners ETF) is Energy Equities fund tracking the Nasdaq Sprott Nickel Miners Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while INTC (Intel Corporation) is a stock. Over the past 3 years, NIKL returned -3.02%/yr vs 56.32%/yr for INTC. At a 0.26 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

NIKL vs. INTC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Sprott Nickel Miners ETF (NIKL) and Intel Corporation (INTC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NIKL achieves a -7.50% return, which is significantly lower than INTC's 202.93% return.

NIKL

• 1D: 0.76%
• 1M: -13.19%
• YTD: -7.50%
• 6M: 4.95%
• 1Y: 27.58%
• 3Y*: -3.02%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

INTC

• 1D: -0.83%
• 1M: 3.36%
• YTD: 202.93%
• 6M: 176.00%
• 1Y: 452.00%
• 3Y*: 56.32%
• 5Y*: 16.32%
• 10Y*: 15.94%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NIKL vs. INTC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
NIKL Sprott Nickel Miners ETF	-7.50%	52.05%	-22.48%	-17.88%
INTC Intel Corporation	202.93%	84.04%	-59.57%	80.60%

Correlation

The correlation between NIKL and INTC is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.22
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.25
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 23, 2023	0.26

Return for Risk

NIKL vs. INTC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NIKL

NIKL Risk / Return Rank: 21
NIKL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 20
NIKL Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
NIKL Omega Ratio Rank: 22
NIKL Calmar Ratio Rank: 21
NIKL Martin Ratio Rank: 20

INTC

INTC Risk / Return Rank: 98
INTC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
INTC Sortino Ratio Rank: 98
INTC Omega Ratio Rank: 96
INTC Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
INTC Martin Ratio Rank: 99

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NIKL vs. INTC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sprott Nickel Miners ETF (NIKL) and Intel Corporation (INTC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	NIKL	INTC	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.66	6.34	-5.68
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.17	5.21	-4.05
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.14	1.66	-0.51
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.93	18.86	-17.93
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.23	45.17	-42.95
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

NIKL vs. INTC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NIKL Sharpe Ratio is 0.66, which is lower than the INTC Sharpe Ratio of 6.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NIKL and INTC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	NIKL	INTC	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.66	6.34	-5.68
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.32	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.37	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.10	0.36	-0.47

Drawdowns

NIKL vs. INTC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NIKL drawdown since its inception was -60.23%, smaller than the maximum INTC drawdown of -82.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NIKL and INTC.

Drawdown Indicators

	NIKL	INTC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-60.23%	-82.25%	+22.02%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-29.87%	-24.17%	-5.70%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-60.23%	-63.80%	+3.57%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-65.95%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-70.80%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-29.33%	-13.64%	-15.69%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-26.58%	-36.67%	+10.09%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	12.42%	10.07%	+2.35%

Volatility

NIKL vs. INTC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Sprott Nickel Miners ETF (NIKL) is 15.35%, while Intel Corporation (INTC) has a volatility of 21.91%. This indicates that NIKL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than INTC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	NIKL	INTC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	15.35%	21.91%	-6.56%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	35.55%	56.03%	-20.48%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	42.12%	71.88%	-29.76%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	32.60%	51.57%	-18.97%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	32.60%	43.76%	-11.16%

Dividends

NIKL vs. INTC - Dividend Comparison

NIKL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.73%, while INTC has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
INTC Intel Corporation	0.00%	0.00%	1.87%	1.47%	5.52%	2.70%	2.65%	2.11%	2.56%	2.33%	2.87%	2.79%
NIKL Sprott Nickel Miners ETF	2.73%	2.53%	3.49%	19.52%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both NIKL and INTC in my portfolio?

NIKL and INTC have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, NIKL or INTC?

INTC has higher volatility (21.91%) compared to NIKL (15.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NIKL dropped -60.23% vs INTC's -82.25%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

INTC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (6.34 vs 0.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.