NIKL vs. DBO
NIKL (Sprott Nickel Miners ETF) and DBO (Invesco DB Oil Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - NIKL is a Energy Equities fund tracking the Nasdaq Sprott Nickel Miners Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while DBO is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the DBIQ Optimum Yield Crude Oil Index Excess Return. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, NIKL returned -3.41%/yr vs 21.86%/yr for DBO. At a 0.09 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. NIKL charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.78%/yr for DBO.
Performance
NIKL vs. DBO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NIKL achieves a -8.20% return, which is significantly lower than DBO's 84.75% return.
NIKL
- 1D
- -8.49%
- 1M
- -14.45%
- YTD
- -8.20%
- 6M
- 5.56%
- 1Y
- 32.72%
- 3Y*
- -3.41%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DBO
- 1D
- 2.27%
- 1M
- -2.34%
- YTD
- 84.75%
- 6M
- 81.10%
- 1Y
- 80.26%
- 3Y*
- 21.86%
- 5Y*
- 15.98%
- 10Y*
- 11.37%
NIKL vs. DBO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
NIKL Sprott Nickel Miners ETF | -8.20% | 52.05% | -22.48% | -17.88% |
DBO Invesco DB Oil Fund | 84.75% | -11.71% | 7.85% | 6.63% |
Correlation
The correlation between NIKL and DBO is -0.14, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.14 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.08 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 23, 2023 | 0.09 |
The correlation between NIKL and DBO shifts across timeframes, from -0.14 (1 year) to 0.09 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
NIKL vs. DBO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
NIKL
DBO
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Basic Materials
NIKL
DBO
-
Communication Services
NIKL
-
DBO
-
Consumer Cyclical
NIKL
-
DBO
-
Consumer Defensive
NIKL
-
DBO
-
Energy
NIKL
-
DBO
-
Financial Services
NIKL
-
DBO
Healthcare
NIKL
-
DBO
-
Industrials
NIKL
-
DBO
-
Real Estate
NIKL
-
DBO
-
Technology
NIKL
-
DBO
-
Utilities
NIKL
-
DBO
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NIKL vs. DBO — Risk / Return Rank
NIKL
DBO
NIKL vs. DBO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sprott Nickel Miners ETF (NIKL) and Invesco DB Oil Fund (DBO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| NIKL | DBO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.56 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.63 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 1.38 | -0.22 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.10 | 4.44 | -3.34 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.67 | 9.02 | -6.35 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NIKL | DBO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.78 | 2.34 | -1.56 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.50 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.36 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.11 | 0.02 | -0.13 |
Drawdowns
NIKL vs. DBO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NIKL drawdown since its inception was -60.23%, smaller than the maximum DBO drawdown of -90.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NIKL and DBO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NIKL | DBO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -60.23% | -90.18% | +29.95% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -29.87% | -18.19% | -11.68% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -60.23% | -28.20% | -32.03% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -37.68% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -61.69% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -29.87% | -51.38% | +21.51% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -26.58% | -62.25% | +35.67% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 12.29% | 8.92% | +3.37% |
Volatility
NIKL vs. DBO - Volatility Comparison
Sprott Nickel Miners ETF (NIKL) has a higher volatility of 15.28% compared to Invesco DB Oil Fund (DBO) at 12.61%. This indicates that NIKL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DBO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NIKL | DBO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 15.28% | 12.61% | +2.67% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 35.54% | 28.20% | +7.34% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 42.12% | 34.46% | +7.66% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 32.62% | 32.29% | +0.33% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 32.62% | 31.78% | +0.84% |
NIKL vs. DBO - Expense Ratio Comparison
NIKL has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than DBO's 0.78% expense ratio.
Dividends
NIKL vs. DBO - Dividend Comparison
NIKL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.75%, more than DBO's 1.90% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DBO Invesco DB Oil Fund | 1.90% | 3.51% | 4.68% | 4.59% | 0.66% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.63% | 1.58% |
NIKL Sprott Nickel Miners ETF | 2.75% | 2.53% | 3.49% | 19.52% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NIKL and DBO have a correlation of -0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NIKL has higher volatility (15.28%) compared to DBO (12.61%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NIKL dropped -60.23% vs DBO's -90.18%.
On 3-year performance, DBO leads with 21.86% vs -3.41% for NIKL. On fees, NIKL is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, DBO has been the lower-risk option at 12.61%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, DBO has performed better with a 21.86% return vs -3.41%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
NIKL is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.78% for DBO.
NIKL has the higher dividend yield at 2.75%, compared with 1.90% for DBO.
NIKL is categorized as Energy Equities, while DBO is Oil & Gas. NIKL tracks Nasdaq Sprott Nickel Miners Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while DBO tracks DBIQ Optimum Yield Crude Oil Index Excess Return. They also come from different issuers: Sprott and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for NIKL and 0.78% for DBO.
DBO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.34 vs 0.78), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for NIKL and DBO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer