NICSX vs. GXXIX
Compare and contrast key facts about Nicholas Fund (NICSX) and abrdn U.S. Sustainable Leaders Fund (GXXIX).
NICSX is managed by Nicholas. It was launched on Jul 14, 1969. GXXIX is managed by Aberdeen. It was launched on Jun 30, 2000.
Performance
NICSX vs. GXXIX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
NICSX vs. GXXIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NICSX Nicholas Fund | -10.51% | 4.45% | 11.80% | 34.17% | -18.15% | 26.58% | 18.91% | 33.68% | -3.71% | 17.55% |
GXXIX abrdn U.S. Sustainable Leaders Fund | -10.06% | 3.82% | 10.11% | 15.19% | -26.55% | 81.37% | 29.56% | 36.96% | -6.73% | 20.42% |
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with NICSX having a -10.51% return and GXXIX slightly higher at -10.06%. Over the past 10 years, NICSX has underperformed GXXIX with an annualized return of 10.26%, while GXXIX has yielded a comparatively higher 13.01% annualized return.
NICSX
- 1D
- 0.30%
- 1M
- -7.85%
- YTD
- -10.51%
- 6M
- -10.20%
- 1Y
- -2.60%
- 3Y*
- 8.62%
- 5Y*
- 6.92%
- 10Y*
- 10.26%
GXXIX
- 1D
- -0.24%
- 1M
- -7.99%
- YTD
- -10.06%
- 6M
- -10.18%
- 1Y
- 0.30%
- 3Y*
- 4.65%
- 5Y*
- 8.96%
- 10Y*
- 13.01%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
NICSX vs. GXXIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
NICSX has a 0.71% expense ratio, which is lower than GXXIX's 0.97% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
NICSX vs. GXXIX — Risk / Return Rank
NICSX
GXXIX
NICSX vs. GXXIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nicholas Fund (NICSX) and abrdn U.S. Sustainable Leaders Fund (GXXIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| NICSX | GXXIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.13 | 0.05 | -0.18 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.07 | 0.19 | -0.26 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.99 | 1.03 | -0.03 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.30 | -0.08 | -0.22 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.08 | -0.31 | -0.77 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NICSX | GXXIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.13 | 0.05 | -0.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.40 | 0.32 | +0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.57 | 0.55 | +0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.63 | 0.59 | +0.04 |
Correlation
The correlation between NICSX and GXXIX is 0.92, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
NICSX vs. GXXIX - Dividend Comparison
NICSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.30%, more than GXXIX's 2.55% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NICSX Nicholas Fund | 10.30% | 9.22% | 3.97% | 6.81% | 2.26% | 11.84% | 6.76% | 8.13% | 5.38% | 15.55% | 3.63% | 6.19% |
GXXIX abrdn U.S. Sustainable Leaders Fund | 2.55% | 2.30% | 0.00% | 0.28% | 0.39% | 59.39% | 14.10% | 9.76% | 12.93% | 10.11% | 12.20% | 5.82% |
Drawdowns
NICSX vs. GXXIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NICSX drawdown since its inception was -50.20%, which is greater than GXXIX's maximum drawdown of -33.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NICSX and GXXIX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| NICSX | GXXIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -50.20% | -33.65% | -16.55% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.20% | -11.78% | -1.42% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.32% | -33.65% | +8.33% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.44% | -33.65% | +0.21% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.94% | -13.31% | +0.37% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.66% | -6.20% | -1.46% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.71% | 3.09% | +0.62% |
Volatility
NICSX vs. GXXIX - Volatility Comparison
Nicholas Fund (NICSX) and abrdn U.S. Sustainable Leaders Fund (GXXIX) have volatilities of 4.10% and 4.14%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| NICSX | GXXIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.10% | 4.14% | -0.04% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.86% | 8.83% | +0.03% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.96% | 16.52% | +0.44% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.33% | 27.75% | -10.42% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.93% | 23.70% | -5.77% |