PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
NICSX vs. MPGFX
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Key characteristics


NICSXMPGFX
YTD Return14.04%16.63%
1Y Return25.44%28.62%
3Y Return (Ann)10.15%7.91%
5Y Return (Ann)15.27%14.00%
10Y Return (Ann)11.86%11.42%
Sharpe Ratio2.032.17
Daily Std Dev12.41%12.90%
Max Drawdown-50.19%-60.43%
Current Drawdown-0.77%-2.30%

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.9

The correlation between NICSX and MPGFX is 0.86, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Performance

NICSX vs. MPGFX - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, NICSX achieves a 14.04% return, which is significantly lower than MPGFX's 16.63% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with NICSX having a 11.86% annualized return and MPGFX not far behind at 11.42%. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-5.00%0.00%5.00%10.00%AprilMayJuneJulyAugustSeptember
4.10%
6.47%
NICSX
MPGFX

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


NICSX vs. MPGFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

NICSX has a 0.71% expense ratio, which is higher than MPGFX's 0.61% expense ratio.


NICSX
Nicholas Fund
Expense ratio chart for NICSX: current value at 0.71% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.71%
Expense ratio chart for MPGFX: current value at 0.61% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.61%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

NICSX vs. MPGFX - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nicholas Fund (NICSX) and Mairs & Power Growth Fund (MPGFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NICSX
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for NICSX, currently valued at 2.03, compared to the broader market-1.000.001.002.003.004.005.002.03
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for NICSX, currently valued at 2.77, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.002.77
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for NICSX, currently valued at 1.36, compared to the broader market1.002.003.004.001.36
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for NICSX, currently valued at 3.01, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.0020.003.01
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for NICSX, currently valued at 10.93, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.0010.93
MPGFX
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for MPGFX, currently valued at 2.17, compared to the broader market-1.000.001.002.003.004.005.002.17
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for MPGFX, currently valued at 2.91, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.002.91
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for MPGFX, currently valued at 1.39, compared to the broader market1.002.003.004.001.39
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for MPGFX, currently valued at 1.83, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.0020.001.83
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for MPGFX, currently valued at 11.21, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.0011.21

NICSX vs. MPGFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NICSX Sharpe Ratio is 2.03, which roughly equals the MPGFX Sharpe Ratio of 2.17. The chart below compares the 12-month rolling Sharpe Ratio of NICSX and MPGFX.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio1.001.502.002.503.00AprilMayJuneJulyAugustSeptember
2.03
2.17
NICSX
MPGFX

Dividends

NICSX vs. MPGFX - Dividend Comparison

NICSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.36%, more than MPGFX's 2.13% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
NICSX
Nicholas Fund
7.36%6.81%2.26%11.84%6.76%8.13%8.00%15.55%3.63%6.19%8.58%4.82%
MPGFX
Mairs & Power Growth Fund
2.13%2.34%8.80%8.13%8.81%7.39%8.76%9.47%5.84%7.92%3.37%2.40%

Drawdowns

NICSX vs. MPGFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NICSX drawdown since its inception was -50.19%, smaller than the maximum MPGFX drawdown of -60.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NICSX and MPGFX. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-10.00%-8.00%-6.00%-4.00%-2.00%0.00%AprilMayJuneJulyAugustSeptember
-0.77%
-2.30%
NICSX
MPGFX

Volatility

NICSX vs. MPGFX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Nicholas Fund (NICSX) is 3.34%, while Mairs & Power Growth Fund (MPGFX) has a volatility of 3.91%. This indicates that NICSX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MPGFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%3.00%4.00%5.00%6.00%AprilMayJuneJulyAugustSeptember
3.34%
3.91%
NICSX
MPGFX