NHYM vs. HEFT
NHYM (Nuveen High Yield Municipal Income ETF) and HEFT (Hedgeye Fourth Turning ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - NHYM is a High Yield Muni fund actively managed by Nuveen, while HEFT is a Long-Short fund actively managed by Hedgeye. Both are actively managed. At a correlation of -0.17, they often move in opposite directions. NHYM charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.70%/yr for HEFT.
Performance
NHYM vs. HEFT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NHYM achieves a 2.83% return, which is significantly lower than HEFT's 7.94% return.
NHYM
- 1D
- 0.28%
- 1M
- 1.10%
- YTD
- 2.83%
- 6M
- 3.37%
- 1Y
- 8.84%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HEFT
- 1D
- 0.32%
- 1M
- 4.26%
- YTD
- 7.94%
- 6M
- 8.00%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NHYM vs. HEFT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
NHYM Nuveen High Yield Municipal Income ETF | 2.83% | 0.36% |
HEFT Hedgeye Fourth Turning ETF | 7.94% | 0.98% |
Correlation
The correlation between NHYM and HEFT is -0.17, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 24, 2025 | -0.17 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NHYM vs. HEFT — Risk / Return Rank
NHYM
HEFT
NHYM vs. HEFT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen High Yield Municipal Income ETF (NHYM) and Hedgeye Fourth Turning ETF (HEFT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| NHYM | HEFT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.02 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.13 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.18 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.32 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NHYM | HEFT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.02 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.77 | 1.45 | -0.68 |
Drawdowns
NHYM vs. HEFT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NHYM drawdown since its inception was -6.11%, smaller than the maximum HEFT drawdown of -9.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NHYM and HEFT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NHYM | HEFT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -6.11% | -9.17% | +3.06% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.77% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -2.62% | +2.62% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.74% | -3.13% | +1.39% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.95% | — | — |
Volatility
NHYM vs. HEFT - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NHYM | HEFT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.34% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.65% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.39% | 12.58% | -8.19% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.94% | 12.58% | -6.64% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.94% | 12.58% | -6.64% |
NHYM vs. HEFT - Expense Ratio Comparison
NHYM has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than HEFT's 0.70% expense ratio.
Dividends
NHYM vs. HEFT - Dividend Comparison
NHYM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.53%, more than HEFT's 0.02% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
HEFT Hedgeye Fourth Turning ETF | 0.02% | 0.02% |
NHYM Nuveen High Yield Municipal Income ETF | 4.53% | 4.06% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NHYM and HEFT have a correlation of -0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, NHYM is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
NHYM is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for HEFT.
NHYM has the higher dividend yield at 4.53%, compared with 0.02% for HEFT.
NHYM is categorized as High Yield Muni, while HEFT is Long-Short. They also come from different issuers: Nuveen and Hedgeye. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for NHYM and 0.70% for HEFT.
Find the right allocation for NHYM and HEFT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer