PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NHYM vs. FTGC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NHYM vs. FTGC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nuveen High Yield Municipal Income ETF (NHYM) and First Trust Global Tactical Commodity Strategy Fund (FTGC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NHYM achieves a 2.69% return, which is significantly lower than FTGC's 18.86% return.


NHYM

1D
-0.10%
1M
1.47%
YTD
2.69%
6M
2.75%
1Y
7.77%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

FTGC

1D
-1.14%
1M
-7.37%
YTD
18.86%
6M
17.54%
1Y
28.18%
3Y*
14.26%
5Y*
12.29%
10Y*
7.15%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NHYM vs. FTGC - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between NHYM and FTGC is -0.16, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.16

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 23, 2025

-0.12

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NHYM vs. FTGC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NHYM
NHYM Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
NHYM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NHYM Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
NHYM Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
NHYM Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
NHYM Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank

FTGC
FTGC Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
FTGC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FTGC Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
FTGC Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
FTGC Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
FTGC Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NHYM vs. FTGC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen High Yield Municipal Income ETF (NHYM) and First Trust Global Tactical Commodity Strategy Fund (FTGC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


NHYMFTGCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.02

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.38

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.32

+0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.82

2.60

+0.21

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.26

9.67

-1.41

NHYM vs. FTGC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NHYM Sharpe Ratio is 1.84, which is comparable to the FTGC Sharpe Ratio of 1.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NHYM and FTGC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NHYM vs. FTGC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NHYM drawdown since its inception was -6.11%, smaller than the maximum FTGC drawdown of -59.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NHYM and FTGC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NHYMFTGCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-6.11%

-59.47%

+53.36%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.77%

-10.87%

+8.10%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.87%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.64%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.91%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.32%

-10.87%

+10.55%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.67%

-27.34%

+25.67%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.94%

2.94%

-2.00%

Volatility

NHYM vs. FTGC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Nuveen High Yield Municipal Income ETF (NHYM) is 0.99%, while First Trust Global Tactical Commodity Strategy Fund (FTGC) has a volatility of 3.07%. This indicates that NHYM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FTGC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NHYMFTGCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.99%

3.07%

-2.08%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.65%

13.21%

-10.56%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.25%

15.70%

-11.45%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.83%

15.87%

-10.04%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.83%

14.71%

-8.88%

NHYM vs. FTGC - Expense Ratio Comparison

NHYM has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than FTGC's 0.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

NHYM vs. FTGC - Dividend Comparison

NHYM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.53%, less than FTGC's 16.13% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
FTGC
First Trust Global Tactical Commodity Strategy Fund
16.13%17.74%3.05%3.34%10.35%7.21%0.00%0.81%0.80%1.21%
NHYM
Nuveen High Yield Municipal Income ETF
4.53%4.06%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


NHYM and FTGC have a correlation of -0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FTGC has higher volatility (3.07%) compared to NHYM (0.99%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NHYM dropped -6.11% vs FTGC's -59.47%.

On 1-year performance, FTGC leads with 28.18% vs 7.77% for NHYM. On fees, NHYM is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, NHYM has been the lower-risk option at 0.99%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, FTGC has performed better with a 28.18% return vs 7.77%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

NHYM is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for FTGC.

FTGC has the higher dividend yield at 16.13%, compared with 4.53% for NHYM.

NHYM is categorized as High Yield Muni, while FTGC is Commodities. They also come from different issuers: Nuveen and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for NHYM and 0.95% for FTGC.

NHYM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.84 vs 1.82), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NHYM and FTGC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer