NHYM vs. FBDC
NHYM (Nuveen High Yield Municipal Income ETF) and FBDC (FT Confluence BDC & Specialty Finance Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - NHYM is a High Yield Muni fund actively managed by Nuveen, while FBDC is a Financials Equities fund actively managed by First Trust. Both are actively managed. At a 0.00 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. NHYM charges 0.35%/yr vs 1.35%/yr for FBDC.
Performance
NHYM vs. FBDC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NHYM achieves a 2.83% return, which is significantly higher than FBDC's -6.73% return.
NHYM
- 1D
- 0.28%
- 1M
- 1.10%
- YTD
- 2.83%
- 6M
- 3.37%
- 1Y
- 8.84%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FBDC
- 1D
- -0.28%
- 1M
- -4.81%
- YTD
- -6.73%
- 6M
- -6.36%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NHYM vs. FBDC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
NHYM Nuveen High Yield Municipal Income ETF | 2.83% | 4.65% |
FBDC FT Confluence BDC & Specialty Finance Income ETF | -6.73% | -2.43% |
Correlation
The correlation between NHYM and FBDC is 0.00, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 1, 2025 | 0.00 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NHYM vs. FBDC — Risk / Return Rank
NHYM
FBDC
NHYM vs. FBDC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen High Yield Municipal Income ETF (NHYM) and FT Confluence BDC & Specialty Finance Income ETF (FBDC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| NHYM | FBDC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.02 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.13 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.18 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.32 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NHYM | FBDC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.02 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.77 | -0.55 | +1.31 |
Drawdowns
NHYM vs. FBDC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NHYM drawdown since its inception was -6.11%, smaller than the maximum FBDC drawdown of -20.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NHYM and FBDC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NHYM | FBDC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -6.11% | -20.60% | +14.49% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.77% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -14.70% | +14.70% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.74% | -10.11% | +8.37% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.95% | — | — |
Volatility
NHYM vs. FBDC - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NHYM | FBDC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.34% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.65% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.39% | 17.83% | -13.44% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.94% | 17.83% | -11.89% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.94% | 17.83% | -11.89% |
NHYM vs. FBDC - Expense Ratio Comparison
NHYM has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than FBDC's 1.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
NHYM vs. FBDC - Dividend Comparison
NHYM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.53%, less than FBDC's 11.18% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
FBDC FT Confluence BDC & Specialty Finance Income ETF | 11.18% | 5.41% |
NHYM Nuveen High Yield Municipal Income ETF | 4.53% | 4.06% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NHYM and FBDC have a correlation of 0.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, NHYM is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
NHYM is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 1.35% for FBDC.
FBDC has the higher dividend yield at 11.18%, compared with 4.53% for NHYM.
NHYM is categorized as High Yield Muni, while FBDC is Financials Equities. They also come from different issuers: Nuveen and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for NHYM and 1.35% for FBDC.
Find the right allocation for NHYM and FBDC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer