NHYM vs. EVYM
NHYM (Nuveen High Yield Municipal Income ETF) and EVYM (Eaton Vance High Income Municipal ETF) are both High Yield Muni funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, NHYM returned 8.84% vs 10.73% for EVYM. A 0.74 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. NHYM charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for EVYM.
Performance
NHYM vs. EVYM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NHYM achieves a 2.83% return, which is significantly lower than EVYM's 3.45% return.
NHYM
- 1D
- 0.28%
- 1M
- 1.10%
- YTD
- 2.83%
- 6M
- 3.37%
- 1Y
- 8.84%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EVYM
- 1D
- 0.12%
- 1M
- 1.20%
- YTD
- 3.45%
- 6M
- 4.23%
- 1Y
- 10.73%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NHYM vs. EVYM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
NHYM Nuveen High Yield Municipal Income ETF | 2.83% | 1.61% |
EVYM Eaton Vance High Income Municipal ETF | 3.45% | 3.70% |
Correlation
The correlation between NHYM and EVYM is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 28, 2025 | 0.74 |
The correlation between NHYM and EVYM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.71 to 0.74 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NHYM vs. EVYM — Risk / Return Rank
NHYM
EVYM
NHYM vs. EVYM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen High Yield Municipal Income ETF (NHYM) and Eaton Vance High Income Municipal ETF (EVYM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| NHYM | EVYM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.02 | 2.93 | -0.91 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.13 | 4.53 | -1.40 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 1.62 | -0.20 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.18 | 3.70 | -0.52 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.32 | 14.05 | -4.73 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NHYM | EVYM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.02 | 2.93 | -0.91 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.77 | 0.95 | -0.18 |
Drawdowns
NHYM vs. EVYM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NHYM drawdown since its inception was -6.11%, roughly equal to the maximum EVYM drawdown of -6.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NHYM and EVYM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NHYM | EVYM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -6.11% | -6.08% | -0.03% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.77% | -2.77% | 0.00% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.74% | -1.49% | -0.25% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.95% | 0.73% | +0.22% |
Volatility
NHYM vs. EVYM - Volatility Comparison
Nuveen High Yield Municipal Income ETF (NHYM) has a higher volatility of 1.34% compared to Eaton Vance High Income Municipal ETF (EVYM) at 0.94%. This indicates that NHYM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EVYM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NHYM | EVYM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.34% | 0.94% | +0.40% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.65% | 2.59% | +0.06% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.39% | 3.71% | +0.68% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.94% | 6.09% | -0.15% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.94% | 6.09% | -0.15% |
NHYM vs. EVYM - Expense Ratio Comparison
NHYM has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than EVYM's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
NHYM vs. EVYM - Dividend Comparison
NHYM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.53%, less than EVYM's 4.77% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
EVYM Eaton Vance High Income Municipal ETF | 4.77% | 3.72% |
NHYM Nuveen High Yield Municipal Income ETF | 4.53% | 4.06% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NHYM and EVYM have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NHYM has higher volatility (1.34%) compared to EVYM (0.94%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NHYM dropped -6.11% vs EVYM's -6.08%.
On 1-year performance, EVYM leads with 10.73% vs 8.84% for NHYM. On fees, NHYM is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, EVYM has been the lower-risk option at 0.94%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, EVYM has performed better with a 10.73% return vs 8.84%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
NHYM is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for EVYM.
EVYM has the higher dividend yield at 4.77%, compared with 4.53% for NHYM.
They also come from different issuers: Nuveen and Eaton Vance. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for NHYM and 0.40% for EVYM.
EVYM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.93 vs 2.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for NHYM and EVYM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer