NHYB vs. NUSC
NHYB (Nuveen High Yield Corporate Bond ETF) and NUSC (Nuveen ESG Small-Cap ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - NHYB is a High Yield Bonds fund tracking the ICE BofA BB-B US Cash Pay High Yield Constrained Index, while NUSC is a Small Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the MSCI TIAA ESG USA Small Cap. Both are passively managed. A 0.69 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. NHYB charges 0.08%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for NUSC.
Performance
NHYB vs. NUSC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NHYB achieves a 2.24% return, which is significantly lower than NUSC's 14.96% return.
NHYB
- 1D
- -0.12%
- 1M
- 0.20%
- 6M
- 1.83%
- YTD
- 2.24%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NUSC
- 1D
- 0.29%
- 1M
- 0.71%
- 6M
- 7.90%
- YTD
- 14.96%
- 1Y
- 25.34%
- 3Y*
- 11.54%
- 5Y*
- 6.03%
- 10Y*
- —
NHYB vs. NUSC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
NHYB Nuveen High Yield Corporate Bond ETF | 2.24% | 1.24% |
NUSC Nuveen ESG Small-Cap ETF | 14.96% | 2.21% |
Correlation
The correlation between NHYB and NUSC is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 24, 2025 | 0.69 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NHYB vs. NUSC — Risk / Return Rank
NHYB
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
NUSC
NHYB vs. NUSC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (NHYB) and Nuveen ESG Small-Cap ETF (NUSC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| NHYB | NUSC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.26 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.52 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 9.04 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
NHYB vs. NUSC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NHYB drawdown since its inception was -2.40%, smaller than the maximum NUSC drawdown of -41.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NHYB and NUSC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NHYB | NUSC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -2.40% | -41.49% | +39.09% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -10.10% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -26.95% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -28.85% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.16% | -1.52% | +1.36% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.34% | -8.12% | +7.78% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.81% | — |
Volatility
NHYB vs. NUSC - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NHYB | NUSC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 3.43% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 12.57% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.54% | 17.20% | -13.66% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.54% | 21.14% | -17.60% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.54% | 22.28% | -18.74% |
NHYB vs. NUSC - Expense Ratio Comparison
NHYB has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than NUSC's 0.30% expense ratio.
Dividends
NHYB vs. NUSC - Dividend Comparison
NHYB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.82%, more than NUSC's 0.91% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NHYB Nuveen High Yield Corporate Bond ETF | 4.82% | 1.28% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
NUSC Nuveen ESG Small-Cap ETF | 0.91% | 1.05% | 1.15% | 1.11% | 1.16% | 7.06% | 0.52% | 0.90% | 3.95% | 0.94% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NHYB and NUSC have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, NHYB is cheaper at 0.08% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
NHYB is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for NUSC.
NHYB has the higher dividend yield at 4.82%, compared with 0.91% for NUSC.
NHYB is categorized as High Yield Bonds, while NUSC is Small Cap Growth Equities. NHYB tracks ICE BofA BB-B US Cash Pay High Yield Constrained Index, while NUSC tracks MSCI TIAA ESG USA Small Cap. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for NHYB and 0.30% for NUSC.
Find the right allocation for NHYB and NUSC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer