NHYB vs. HYHG
NHYB (Nuveen High Yield Corporate Bond ETF) and HYHG (ProShares High Yield-Interest Rate Hedged) are both High Yield Bonds funds - NHYB tracks the ICE BofA BB-B US Cash Pay High Yield Constrained Index while HYHG tracks the Citi High Yield (Treasury Rate-Hedged) Index. Both are passively managed. At a 0.36 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. NHYB charges 0.08%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for HYHG.
Performance
NHYB vs. HYHG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NHYB achieves a 1.99% return, which is significantly lower than HYHG's 3.16% return.
NHYB
- 1D
- 0.04%
- 1M
- 0.33%
- YTD
- 1.99%
- 6M
- 1.95%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HYHG
- 1D
- -0.22%
- 1M
- -0.04%
- YTD
- 3.16%
- 6M
- 3.69%
- 1Y
- 7.01%
- 3Y*
- 9.50%
- 5Y*
- 6.85%
- 10Y*
- 6.43%
NHYB vs. HYHG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
NHYB Nuveen High Yield Corporate Bond ETF | 1.99% | 1.24% |
HYHG ProShares High Yield-Interest Rate Hedged | 3.16% | 1.06% |
Correlation
The correlation between NHYB and HYHG is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 24, 2025 | 0.36 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NHYB vs. HYHG — Risk / Return Rank
NHYB
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
HYHG
NHYB vs. HYHG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (NHYB) and ProShares High Yield-Interest Rate Hedged (HYHG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| NHYB | HYHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.23 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 3.49 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 11.61 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
NHYB vs. HYHG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NHYB drawdown since its inception was -2.40%, smaller than the maximum HYHG drawdown of -25.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NHYB and HYHG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NHYB | HYHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -2.40% | -25.71% | +23.31% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -2.02% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -7.47% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -9.21% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -25.71% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.12% | -0.67% | +0.55% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.36% | -3.03% | +2.67% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.61% | — |
Volatility
NHYB vs. HYHG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NHYB | HYHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 1.27% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 4.37% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.61% | 5.59% | -1.98% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.61% | 8.17% | -4.56% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.61% | 9.10% | -5.49% |
NHYB vs. HYHG - Expense Ratio Comparison
NHYB has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than HYHG's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
NHYB vs. HYHG - Dividend Comparison
NHYB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.24%, less than HYHG's 6.77% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HYHG ProShares High Yield-Interest Rate Hedged | 6.77% | 6.97% | 6.57% | 6.07% | 5.58% | 4.54% | 5.21% | 6.06% | 6.45% | 5.57% | 5.37% | 6.37% |
NHYB Nuveen High Yield Corporate Bond ETF | 4.24% | 1.28% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NHYB and HYHG have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, NHYB is cheaper at 0.08% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
NHYB is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for HYHG.
HYHG has the higher dividend yield at 6.77%, compared with 4.24% for NHYB.
NHYB tracks ICE BofA BB-B US Cash Pay High Yield Constrained Index, while HYHG tracks Citi High Yield (Treasury Rate-Hedged) Index. They also come from different issuers: Nuveen and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for NHYB and 0.50% for HYHG.
Find the right allocation for NHYB and HYHG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer