NHMRX vs. FGIYX
Compare and contrast key facts about Nuveen High Yield Municipal Bond Fund (NHMRX) and Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund (FGIYX).
NHMRX is managed by Nuveen. It was launched on Jun 6, 1999. FGIYX is managed by Nuveen. It was launched on Dec 16, 2007.
Performance
NHMRX vs. FGIYX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
NHMRX vs. FGIYX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NHMRX Nuveen High Yield Municipal Bond Fund | -0.75% | 3.24% | 5.62% | 7.31% | -14.96% | 10.37% | 3.25% | 12.59% | 2.06% | 12.10% |
FGIYX Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund | 9.48% | 18.08% | 10.91% | 8.90% | -6.10% | 14.85% | -2.55% | 36.57% | -7.70% | 19.64% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NHMRX achieves a -0.75% return, which is significantly lower than FGIYX's 9.48% return. Over the past 10 years, NHMRX has underperformed FGIYX with an annualized return of 3.64%, while FGIYX has yielded a comparatively higher 9.53% annualized return.
NHMRX
- 1D
- 0.36%
- 1M
- -3.23%
- YTD
- -0.75%
- 6M
- 1.07%
- 1Y
- 2.53%
- 3Y*
- 4.02%
- 5Y*
- 1.21%
- 10Y*
- 3.64%
FGIYX
- 1D
- 0.46%
- 1M
- -3.80%
- YTD
- 9.48%
- 6M
- 10.07%
- 1Y
- 21.18%
- 3Y*
- 14.29%
- 5Y*
- 10.70%
- 10Y*
- 9.53%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
NHMRX vs. FGIYX - Expense Ratio Comparison
NHMRX has a 0.52% expense ratio, which is lower than FGIYX's 0.97% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
NHMRX vs. FGIYX — Risk / Return Rank
NHMRX
FGIYX
NHMRX vs. FGIYX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen High Yield Municipal Bond Fund (NHMRX) and Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund (FGIYX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| NHMRX | FGIYX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.42 | 1.78 | -1.36 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.61 | 2.29 | -1.68 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.12 | 1.36 | -0.24 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.42 | 2.66 | -2.24 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.02 | 12.33 | -11.31 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NHMRX | FGIYX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.42 | 1.78 | -1.36 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.18 | 0.82 | -0.64 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.54 | 0.62 | -0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.87 | 0.45 | +0.42 |
Correlation
The correlation between NHMRX and FGIYX is 0.07, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
NHMRX vs. FGIYX - Dividend Comparison
NHMRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.75%, less than FGIYX's 9.39% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NHMRX Nuveen High Yield Municipal Bond Fund | 5.75% | 6.54% | 5.79% | 7.34% | 5.64% | 5.09% | 5.03% | 5.39% | 5.47% | 5.38% | 5.88% | 5.60% |
FGIYX Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund | 9.39% | 10.28% | 7.74% | 2.51% | 6.41% | 7.48% | 1.62% | 12.32% | 6.62% | 6.10% | 8.64% | 3.31% |
Drawdowns
NHMRX vs. FGIYX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NHMRX drawdown since its inception was -45.45%, smaller than the maximum FGIYX drawdown of -49.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NHMRX and FGIYX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| NHMRX | FGIYX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -45.45% | -49.18% | +3.73% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.92% | -8.24% | +0.32% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.52% | -20.92% | -0.60% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -22.22% | -38.06% | +15.84% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.23% | -3.80% | +0.57% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.35% | -7.08% | +1.73% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.28% | 1.78% | +1.50% |
Volatility
NHMRX vs. FGIYX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Nuveen High Yield Municipal Bond Fund (NHMRX) is 1.61%, while Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund (FGIYX) has a volatility of 4.01%. This indicates that NHMRX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FGIYX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| NHMRX | FGIYX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.61% | 4.01% | -2.40% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.63% | 7.06% | -4.43% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.02% | 12.26% | -4.24% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.81% | 13.07% | -6.26% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 6.71% | 15.31% | -8.60% |