NGRRX vs. GSIMX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

NGRRX (Nuveen International Value Fund) and GSIMX (Goldman Sachs GQG Partners International Opportunities Fund) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, NGRRX returned 10.07%/yr vs 9.05%/yr for GSIMX. A 0.79 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. NGRRX charges 0.89%/yr vs 0.76%/yr for GSIMX.

Performance

NGRRX vs. GSIMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nuveen International Value Fund (NGRRX) and Goldman Sachs GQG Partners International Opportunities Fund (GSIMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NGRRX achieves a 6.13% return, which is significantly lower than GSIMX's 6.45% return.

NGRRX

• 1D: 0.22%
• 1M: 3.37%
• YTD: 6.13%
• 6M: 10.30%
• 1Y: 21.59%
• 3Y*: 18.07%
• 5Y*: 10.07%
• 10Y*: 8.69%

GSIMX

• 1D: 0.04%
• 1M: -0.54%
• YTD: 6.45%
• 6M: 8.00%
• 1Y: 12.69%
• 3Y*: 17.16%
• 5Y*: 9.05%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NGRRX vs. GSIMX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
NGRRX Nuveen International Value Fund	6.13%	36.06%	4.57%	20.60%	-8.85%	12.34%	3.92%	18.46%	-18.08%	19.63%
GSIMX Goldman Sachs GQG Partners International Opportunities Fund	6.45%	20.85%	9.66%	22.10%	-11.06%	12.50%	15.77%	27.64%	-6.04%	29.92%

Correlation

The correlation between NGRRX and GSIMX is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.67
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.74
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.80
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2017	0.79

The correlation between NGRRX and GSIMX shifts across timeframes, from 0.67 (1 year) to 0.80 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

NGRRX vs. GSIMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NGRRX

NGRRX Risk / Return Rank: 23
NGRRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 25
NGRRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 24
NGRRX Omega Ratio Rank: 27
NGRRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 18
NGRRX Martin Ratio Rank: 21

GSIMX

GSIMX Risk / Return Rank: 19
GSIMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 19
GSIMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 18
GSIMX Omega Ratio Rank: 20
GSIMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 18
GSIMX Martin Ratio Rank: 19

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NGRRX vs. GSIMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen International Value Fund (NGRRX) and Goldman Sachs GQG Partners International Opportunities Fund (GSIMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	NGRRX	GSIMX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.44	1.27	+0.18
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.07	1.78	+0.28
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.27	1.23	+0.04
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.54	1.56	-0.02
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.36	5.22	+0.14
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

NGRRX vs. GSIMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NGRRX Sharpe Ratio is 1.44, which is comparable to the GSIMX Sharpe Ratio of 1.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NGRRX and GSIMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	NGRRX	GSIMX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.44	1.27	+0.18
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.64	0.63	+0.01
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.53	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.32	0.82	-0.50

Drawdowns

NGRRX vs. GSIMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NGRRX drawdown since its inception was -59.12%, which is greater than GSIMX's maximum drawdown of -28.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NGRRX and GSIMX.

Drawdown Indicators

	NGRRX	GSIMX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-59.12%	-28.84%	-30.28%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.87%	-7.81%	-6.06%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-14.53%	-10.32%	-4.21%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-26.36%	-25.37%	-0.99%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-41.91%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.11%	-3.70%	-0.41%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-15.38%	-4.82%	-10.56%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.97%	2.33%	+1.64%

Volatility

NGRRX vs. GSIMX - Volatility Comparison

Nuveen International Value Fund (NGRRX) has a higher volatility of 4.78% compared to Goldman Sachs GQG Partners International Opportunities Fund (GSIMX) at 2.77%. This indicates that NGRRX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GSIMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	NGRRX	GSIMX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.78%	2.77%	+2.01%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.12%	7.89%	+4.23%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.84%	9.66%	+5.18%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.74%	14.36%	+1.38%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.39%	15.69%	+0.70%

NGRRX vs. GSIMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

NGRRX has a 0.89% expense ratio, which is higher than GSIMX's 0.76% expense ratio.

Dividends

NGRRX vs. GSIMX - Dividend Comparison

NGRRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.21%, less than GSIMX's 4.81% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
GSIMX Goldman Sachs GQG Partners International Opportunities Fund	4.81%	5.12%	11.18%	2.36%	4.89%	2.23%	0.18%	0.65%	0.53%	0.16%	0.00%	0.00%
NGRRX Nuveen International Value Fund	0.21%	0.23%	2.48%	2.07%	5.15%	4.09%	2.15%	3.17%	1.56%	3.13%	2.15%	1.67%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both NGRRX and GSIMX in my portfolio?

NGRRX and GSIMX have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, NGRRX or GSIMX?

NGRRX has higher volatility (4.78%) compared to GSIMX (2.77%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NGRRX dropped -59.12% vs GSIMX's -28.84%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

NGRRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.44 vs 1.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.