NGAS.L vs. INTL.L
NGAS.L (WisdomTree Natural Gas ETF) and INTL.L (WisdomTree Artificial Intelligence UCITS ETF - USD Acc) are both exchange-traded funds - NGAS.L is a Commodities fund tracking the Bloomberg Natural Gas Sub Total Return Index, while INTL.L is a Technology Equities fund tracking the MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, NGAS.L returned -25.67%/yr vs 16.17%/yr for INTL.L. At a 0.01 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. NGAS.L charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for INTL.L.
Performance
NGAS.L vs. INTL.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
NGAS.L is traded in USD, while INTL.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the INTL.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NGAS.L achieves a -11.49% return, which is significantly lower than INTL.L's 49.75% return.
NGAS.L
- 1D
- 2.07%
- 1M
- 4.84%
- YTD
- -11.49%
- 6M
- -29.61%
- 1Y
- -36.85%
- 3Y*
- -25.66%
- 5Y*
- -25.67%
- 10Y*
- -23.35%
INTL.L
- 1D
- -0.43%
- 1M
- 24.19%
- YTD
- 49.75%
- 6M
- 52.46%
- 1Y
- 95.37%
- 3Y*
- 34.41%
- 5Y*
- 16.17%
- 10Y*
- —
NGAS.L vs. INTL.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NGAS.L WisdomTree Natural Gas ETF | -11.49% | -24.72% | -26.18% | -65.28% | 20.27% | 25.42% | -43.27% | -43.01% |
INTL.L WisdomTree Artificial Intelligence UCITS ETF - USD Acc | 49.75% | 23.14% | 11.68% | 56.56% | -42.06% | 16.29% | 74.16% | 35.80% |
Correlation
The correlation between NGAS.L and INTL.L is -0.15, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.15 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.03 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.01 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 22, 2019 | 0.01 |
The correlation between NGAS.L and INTL.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.15 (1 year) to 0.01 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
NGAS.L vs. INTL.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
NGAS.L
INTL.L
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
-
Basic Materials
NGAS.L
INTL.L
-
Communication Services
NGAS.L
-
INTL.L
Consumer Cyclical
NGAS.L
-
INTL.L
Consumer Defensive
NGAS.L
-
INTL.L
Energy
NGAS.L
-
INTL.L
-
Financial Services
NGAS.L
-
INTL.L
Healthcare
NGAS.L
-
INTL.L
Industrials
NGAS.L
-
INTL.L
Real Estate
NGAS.L
-
INTL.L
-
Technology
NGAS.L
-
INTL.L
Utilities
NGAS.L
-
INTL.L
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NGAS.L vs. INTL.L — Risk / Return Rank
NGAS.L
INTL.L
NGAS.L vs. INTL.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Natural Gas ETF (NGAS.L) and WisdomTree Artificial Intelligence UCITS ETF - USD Acc (INTL.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| NGAS.L | INTL.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -4.30 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -5.06 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.91 | 1.54 | -0.63 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.77 | 6.17 | -6.94 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.11 | 19.23 | -20.33 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NGAS.L | INTL.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.66 | 3.63 | -4.30 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.44 | 0.59 | -1.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.46 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.59 | 0.91 | -1.51 |
Drawdowns
NGAS.L vs. INTL.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NGAS.L drawdown since its inception was -99.91%, which is greater than INTL.L's maximum drawdown of -48.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NGAS.L and INTL.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NGAS.L | INTL.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.91% | -48.41% | -51.50% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -47.73% | -15.38% | -32.35% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -70.31% | -31.15% | -39.16% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -93.13% | -46.21% | -46.92% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -94.91% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.91% | -0.43% | -99.48% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -89.09% | -13.96% | -75.13% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 33.25% | 4.94% | +28.31% |
Volatility
NGAS.L vs. INTL.L - Volatility Comparison
WisdomTree Natural Gas ETF (NGAS.L) has a higher volatility of 11.19% compared to WisdomTree Artificial Intelligence UCITS ETF - USD Acc (INTL.L) at 9.77%. This indicates that NGAS.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than INTL.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NGAS.L | INTL.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.19% | 9.77% | +1.42% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 47.23% | 19.50% | +27.73% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 55.38% | 26.17% | +29.21% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 59.00% | 27.54% | +31.46% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 50.65% | 28.09% | +22.56% |
NGAS.L vs. INTL.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
NGAS.L has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than INTL.L's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
NGAS.L vs. INTL.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither NGAS.L nor INTL.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
NGAS.L and INTL.L have a correlation of -0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, INTL.L is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
INTL.L is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for NGAS.L.
NGAS.L is categorized as Commodities, while INTL.L is Technology Equities. NGAS.L tracks Bloomberg Natural Gas Sub Total Return Index, while INTL.L tracks MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for NGAS.L and 0.40% for INTL.L.
Find the right allocation for NGAS.L and INTL.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer