PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NGAS.L vs. INTL.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NGAS.L vs. INTL.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree Natural Gas ETF (NGAS.L) and WisdomTree Artificial Intelligence UCITS ETF - USD Acc (INTL.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

NGAS.L is traded in USD, while INTL.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the INTL.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NGAS.L achieves a -11.49% return, which is significantly lower than INTL.L's 49.75% return.


NGAS.L

1D
2.07%
1M
4.84%
YTD
-11.49%
6M
-29.61%
1Y
-36.85%
3Y*
-25.66%
5Y*
-25.67%
10Y*
-23.35%

INTL.L

1D
-0.43%
1M
24.19%
YTD
49.75%
6M
52.46%
1Y
95.37%
3Y*
34.41%
5Y*
16.17%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NGAS.L vs. INTL.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
NGAS.L
WisdomTree Natural Gas ETF
-11.49%-24.72%-26.18%-65.28%20.27%25.42%-43.27%-43.01%
INTL.L
WisdomTree Artificial Intelligence UCITS ETF - USD Acc
49.75%23.14%11.68%56.56%-42.06%16.29%74.16%35.80%

Correlation

The correlation between NGAS.L and INTL.L is -0.15, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.15

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.03

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.01

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 22, 2019

0.01

The correlation between NGAS.L and INTL.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.15 (1 year) to 0.01 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

NGAS.L vs. INTL.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
NGAS.L
INTL.L

Basic Materials

100.0%

-

Communication Services

-

8.6%

Consumer Cyclical

-

5.6%

Consumer Defensive

-

0.8%

Energy

-

-

Financial Services

-

0.9%

Healthcare

-

2.4%

Industrials

-

2.4%

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

79.3%

Utilities

-

-

Basic Materials

NGAS.L
100.0%
INTL.L

-

Communication Services

NGAS.L

-

INTL.L
8.6%

Consumer Cyclical

NGAS.L

-

INTL.L
5.6%

Consumer Defensive

NGAS.L

-

INTL.L
0.8%

Energy

NGAS.L

-

INTL.L

-

Financial Services

NGAS.L

-

INTL.L
0.9%

Healthcare

NGAS.L

-

INTL.L
2.4%

Industrials

NGAS.L

-

INTL.L
2.4%

Real Estate

NGAS.L

-

INTL.L

-

Technology

NGAS.L

-

INTL.L
79.3%

Utilities

NGAS.L

-

INTL.L

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NGAS.L vs. INTL.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NGAS.L
NGAS.L Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
NGAS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NGAS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
NGAS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
NGAS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
NGAS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 44
Martin Ratio Rank

INTL.L
INTL.L Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
INTL.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
INTL.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
INTL.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
INTL.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
INTL.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NGAS.L vs. INTL.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Natural Gas ETF (NGAS.L) and WisdomTree Artificial Intelligence UCITS ETF - USD Acc (INTL.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NGAS.LINTL.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-4.30

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-5.06

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.91

1.54

-0.63

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.77

6.17

-6.94

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.11

19.23

-20.33

NGAS.L vs. INTL.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NGAS.L Sharpe Ratio is -0.66, which is lower than the INTL.L Sharpe Ratio of 3.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NGAS.L and INTL.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NGAS.LINTL.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.66

3.63

-4.30

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.44

0.59

-1.02

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.46

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.59

0.91

-1.51

Drawdowns

NGAS.L vs. INTL.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NGAS.L drawdown since its inception was -99.91%, which is greater than INTL.L's maximum drawdown of -48.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NGAS.L and INTL.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NGAS.LINTL.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.91%

-48.41%

-51.50%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-47.73%

-15.38%

-32.35%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-70.31%

-31.15%

-39.16%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-93.13%

-46.21%

-46.92%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-94.91%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-99.91%

-0.43%

-99.48%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-89.09%

-13.96%

-75.13%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

33.25%

4.94%

+28.31%

Volatility

NGAS.L vs. INTL.L - Volatility Comparison

WisdomTree Natural Gas ETF (NGAS.L) has a higher volatility of 11.19% compared to WisdomTree Artificial Intelligence UCITS ETF - USD Acc (INTL.L) at 9.77%. This indicates that NGAS.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than INTL.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NGAS.LINTL.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.19%

9.77%

+1.42%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

47.23%

19.50%

+27.73%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

55.38%

26.17%

+29.21%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

59.00%

27.54%

+31.46%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

50.65%

28.09%

+22.56%

NGAS.L vs. INTL.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

NGAS.L has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than INTL.L's 0.40% expense ratio.


Dividends

NGAS.L vs. INTL.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither NGAS.L nor INTL.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


NGAS.L and INTL.L have a correlation of -0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, INTL.L is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

INTL.L is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for NGAS.L.

NGAS.L is categorized as Commodities, while INTL.L is Technology Equities. NGAS.L tracks Bloomberg Natural Gas Sub Total Return Index, while INTL.L tracks MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for NGAS.L and 0.40% for INTL.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NGAS.L and INTL.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer