PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NFXS vs. TECL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NFXS vs. TECL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily NFLX Bear 1X Shares (NFXS) and Direxion Daily Technology Bull 3X Shares (TECL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NFXS achieves a 11.23% return, which is significantly lower than TECL's 125.87% return.


NFXS

1D
2.15%
1M
11.52%
YTD
11.23%
6M
23.05%
1Y
43.26%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

TECL

1D
-2.99%
1M
73.10%
YTD
125.87%
6M
118.69%
1Y
267.85%
3Y*
80.64%
5Y*
43.44%
10Y*
54.49%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NFXS vs. TECL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
NFXS
Direxion Daily NFLX Bear 1X Shares
11.23%-8.56%-21.19%
TECL
Direxion Daily Technology Bull 3X Shares
125.87%38.60%7.83%

Correlation

The correlation between NFXS and TECL is -0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.08

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 4, 2024

-0.29

Over the past year, the inverse relationship between NFXS and TECL has weakened: their correlation has moved from -0.29 to -0.08, meaning they move in opposite directions less often than they have historically.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NFXS vs. TECL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NFXS
NFXS Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
NFXS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NFXS Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
NFXS Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
NFXS Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
NFXS Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank

TECL
TECL Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
TECL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TECL Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
TECL Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
TECL Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
TECL Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NFXS vs. TECL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily NFLX Bear 1X Shares (NFXS) and Direxion Daily Technology Bull 3X Shares (TECL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NFXSTECLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-3.04

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.76

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.48

-0.21

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.39

5.79

-4.40

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.81

16.63

-12.82

NFXS vs. TECL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NFXS Sharpe Ratio is 1.31, which is lower than the TECL Sharpe Ratio of 4.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NFXS and TECL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NFXSTECLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.31

4.35

-3.04

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.59

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.76

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.36

0.76

-1.13

Drawdowns

NFXS vs. TECL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NFXS drawdown since its inception was -50.37%, smaller than the maximum TECL drawdown of -77.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NFXS and TECL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NFXSTECLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-50.37%

-77.96%

+27.59%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-31.31%

-46.58%

+15.27%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-66.58%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-77.96%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-77.96%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-21.98%

-2.99%

-18.99%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-32.39%

-18.38%

-14.01%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.39%

16.19%

-4.80%

Volatility

NFXS vs. TECL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Direxion Daily NFLX Bear 1X Shares (NFXS) is 7.23%, while Direxion Daily Technology Bull 3X Shares (TECL) has a volatility of 20.70%. This indicates that NFXS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TECL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NFXSTECLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.23%

20.70%

-13.47%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

26.37%

49.83%

-23.46%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

33.13%

62.17%

-29.04%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

34.68%

74.09%

-39.41%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

34.68%

72.35%

-37.67%

NFXS vs. TECL - Expense Ratio Comparison

NFXS has a 1.03% expense ratio, which is lower than TECL's 1.08% expense ratio.


Dividends

NFXS vs. TECL - Dividend Comparison

NFXS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.81%, less than TECL's 3.15% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
NFXS
Direxion Daily NFLX Bear 1X Shares
2.81%3.53%0.87%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
TECL
Direxion Daily Technology Bull 3X Shares
3.15%7.19%0.29%0.28%0.22%0.32%0.52%0.25%0.47%0.10%

Frequently Asked Questions


NFXS and TECL have a correlation of -0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TECL has higher volatility (20.70%) compared to NFXS (7.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NFXS dropped -50.37% vs TECL's -77.96%.

On 1-year performance, TECL leads with 267.85% vs 43.26% for NFXS. On fees, NFXS is cheaper at 1.03% per year. On volatility, NFXS has been the lower-risk option at 7.23%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, TECL has performed better with a 267.85% return vs 43.26%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

NFXS is cheaper with a 1.03% expense ratio, compared with 1.08% for TECL.

TECL has the higher dividend yield at 3.15%, compared with 2.81% for NFXS.

NFXS is categorized as Inverse Equities, while TECL is Leveraged Equities. Their fees differ too: 1.03% for NFXS and 1.08% for TECL.

TECL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.35 vs 1.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NFXS and TECL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer