PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NFXS vs. SOXL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NFXS vs. SOXL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily NFLX Bear 1X Shares (NFXS) and Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bull 3X ETF (SOXL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NFXS achieves a 8.89% return, which is significantly lower than SOXL's 567.48% return.


NFXS

1D
2.94%
1M
10.36%
YTD
8.89%
6M
26.62%
1Y
40.25%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

SOXL

1D
5.34%
1M
119.95%
YTD
567.48%
6M
502.28%
1Y
1,438.30%
3Y*
135.13%
5Y*
48.72%
10Y*
65.39%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NFXS vs. SOXL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
NFXS
Direxion Daily NFLX Bear 1X Shares
8.89%-8.56%-21.19%
SOXL
Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bull 3X ETF
567.48%54.91%-22.22%

Correlation

The correlation between NFXS and SOXL is 0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.05

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 4, 2024

-0.15

The correlation between NFXS and SOXL shifts across timeframes, from -0.15 (all time) to 0.05 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NFXS vs. SOXL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NFXS
NFXS Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
NFXS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NFXS Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
NFXS Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
NFXS Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
NFXS Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank

SOXL
SOXL Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
SOXL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SOXL Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
SOXL Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
SOXL Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
SOXL Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NFXS vs. SOXL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily NFLX Bear 1X Shares (NFXS) and Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bull 3X ETF (SOXL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NFXSSOXLDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.22

14.28

-13.06

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.80

5.17

-3.37

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.72

-0.47

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.25

33.47

-32.22

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

3.44

114.79

-111.34

NFXS vs. SOXL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NFXS Sharpe Ratio is 1.22, which is lower than the SOXL Sharpe Ratio of 14.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NFXS and SOXL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NFXSSOXLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.22

14.28

-13.06

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.46

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.66

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.40

0.52

-0.91

Drawdowns

NFXS vs. SOXL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NFXS drawdown since its inception was -50.37%, smaller than the maximum SOXL drawdown of -90.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NFXS and SOXL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NFXSSOXLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-50.37%

-90.46%

+40.09%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-31.31%

-43.47%

+12.16%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-87.88%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-90.46%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-90.46%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-23.62%

0.00%

-23.62%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-32.41%

-35.01%

+2.60%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.37%

12.65%

-1.28%

Volatility

NFXS vs. SOXL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Direxion Daily NFLX Bear 1X Shares (NFXS) is 7.06%, while Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bull 3X ETF (SOXL) has a volatility of 40.82%. This indicates that NFXS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SOXL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NFXSSOXLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.06%

40.82%

-33.76%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

26.35%

81.29%

-54.94%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

33.08%

102.11%

-69.03%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

34.68%

107.25%

-72.57%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

34.68%

99.04%

-64.36%

NFXS vs. SOXL - Expense Ratio Comparison

NFXS has a 1.03% expense ratio, which is higher than SOXL's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

NFXS vs. SOXL - Dividend Comparison

NFXS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.87%, more than SOXL's 0.03% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
NFXS
Direxion Daily NFLX Bear 1X Shares
2.87%3.53%0.87%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SOXL
Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bull 3X ETF
0.03%0.34%1.18%0.51%1.07%0.04%0.05%0.38%1.30%0.09%4.84%

Frequently Asked Questions


NFXS and SOXL have a correlation of 0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SOXL has higher volatility (40.82%) compared to NFXS (7.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NFXS dropped -50.37% vs SOXL's -90.46%.

On 1-year performance, SOXL leads with 1438.30% vs 40.25% for NFXS. On fees, SOXL is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, NFXS has been the lower-risk option at 7.06%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, SOXL has performed better with a 1438.30% return vs 40.25%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SOXL is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.03% for NFXS.

NFXS has the higher dividend yield at 2.87%, compared with 0.03% for SOXL.

NFXS is categorized as Inverse Equities, while SOXL is Leveraged Equities. Their fees differ too: 1.03% for NFXS and 0.75% for SOXL.

SOXL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (14.28 vs 1.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NFXS and SOXL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer