NFXL vs. CRAK

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

NFXL (Direxion Daily NFLX Bull 2X Shares) and CRAK (VanEck Oil Refiners ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - NFXL is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by Direxion, while CRAK is a Energy Equities fund tracking the MVIS Global Oil Refiners Index. NFXL is actively managed, while CRAK is passively managed. Over the past year, NFXL returned -73.19% vs 42.08% for CRAK. At a correlation of -0.02, they often move in opposite directions. NFXL charges 1.06%/yr vs 0.62%/yr for CRAK.

Performance

NFXL vs. CRAK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily NFLX Bull 2X Shares (NFXL) and VanEck Oil Refiners ETF (CRAK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NFXL achieves a -46.29% return, which is significantly lower than CRAK's 20.86% return.

NFXL

• 1D: -0.46%
• 1M: -33.63%
• YTD: -46.29%
• 6M: -46.11%
• 1Y: -73.19%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CRAK

• 1D: -0.83%
• 1M: -6.54%
• YTD: 20.86%
• 6M: 20.73%
• 1Y: 42.08%
• 3Y*: 19.31%
• 5Y*: 12.08%
• 10Y*: 12.77%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NFXL vs. CRAK - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
NFXL Direxion Daily NFLX Bull 2X Shares	-46.29%	-11.98%	51.02%
CRAK VanEck Oil Refiners ETF	20.86%	39.11%	-15.51%

Correlation

The correlation between NFXL and CRAK is -0.12, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.12
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 3, 2024	-0.02

The correlation between NFXL and CRAK shifts across timeframes, from -0.12 (1 year) to -0.02 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

NFXL vs. CRAK - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	NFXL	CRAK
Communication Services	100.0%	-
Basic Materials	-	1.2%
Consumer Cyclical	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	98.8%
Financial Services	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Industrials	-	4.0%
Real Estate	-	-
Technology	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

NFXL vs. CRAK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NFXL

NFXL Risk / Return Rank: 1
NFXL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1
NFXL Sortino Ratio Rank: 0
NFXL Omega Ratio Rank: 0
NFXL Calmar Ratio Rank: 1
NFXL Martin Ratio Rank: 1

CRAK

CRAK Risk / Return Rank: 69
CRAK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 73
CRAK Sortino Ratio Rank: 70
CRAK Omega Ratio Rank: 66
CRAK Calmar Ratio Rank: 69
CRAK Martin Ratio Rank: 66

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NFXL vs. CRAK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily NFLX Bull 2X Shares (NFXL) and VanEck Oil Refiners ETF (CRAK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	NFXL	CRAK	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-1.09	2.21	-3.30
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-2.10	2.98	-5.08
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.74	1.37	-0.64
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.96	3.29	-4.25
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.50	11.53	-13.02

NFXL vs. CRAK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NFXL Sharpe Ratio is -1.09, which is lower than the CRAK Sharpe Ratio of 2.21. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NFXL and CRAK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

NFXL vs. CRAK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NFXL drawdown since its inception was -76.44%, which is greater than CRAK's maximum drawdown of -58.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NFXL and CRAK.

Drawdown Indicators

	NFXL	CRAK	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-76.44%	-58.80%	-17.64%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-76.44%	-12.84%	-63.60%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-35.61%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-35.61%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-58.80%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-76.44%	-12.74%	-63.70%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-29.33%	-12.47%	-16.86%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	48.86%	3.66%	+45.20%

Volatility

NFXL vs. CRAK - Volatility Comparison

Direxion Daily NFLX Bull 2X Shares (NFXL) has a higher volatility of 15.90% compared to VanEck Oil Refiners ETF (CRAK) at 6.42%. This indicates that NFXL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CRAK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	NFXL	CRAK	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	15.90%	6.42%	+9.48%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	50.66%	15.00%	+35.66%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	67.58%	19.11%	+48.47%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	69.38%	20.67%	+48.71%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	69.38%	22.17%	+47.21%

NFXL vs. CRAK - Expense Ratio Comparison

NFXL has a 1.06% expense ratio, which is higher than CRAK's 0.62% expense ratio.

Dividends

NFXL vs. CRAK - Dividend Comparison

NFXL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 15.44%, more than CRAK's 1.67% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CRAK VanEck Oil Refiners ETF	1.67%	2.02%	5.60%	3.65%	3.08%	2.40%	2.64%	1.49%	2.42%	1.66%	3.42%	0.47%
NFXL Direxion Daily NFLX Bull 2X Shares	15.44%	7.97%	0.59%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both NFXL and CRAK in my portfolio?

NFXL and CRAK have a correlation of -0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, NFXL or CRAK?

NFXL has higher volatility (15.90%) compared to CRAK (6.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NFXL dropped -76.44% vs CRAK's -58.80%.

Which ETF is better, NFXL or CRAK?

On 1-year performance, CRAK leads with 42.08% vs -73.19% for NFXL. On fees, CRAK is cheaper at 0.62% per year. On volatility, CRAK has been the lower-risk option at 6.42%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, NFXL or CRAK?

Over the 1-year period, CRAK has performed better with a 42.08% return vs -73.19%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, NFXL or CRAK?

CRAK is cheaper with a 0.62% expense ratio, compared with 1.06% for NFXL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, NFXL or CRAK?

NFXL has the higher dividend yield at 15.44%, compared with 1.67% for CRAK.

What is the main difference between NFXL and CRAK?

NFXL is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while CRAK is Energy Equities. They also come from different issuers: Direxion and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 1.06% for NFXL and 0.62% for CRAK.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CRAK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.21 vs -1.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.