NFLY vs. SBIT
NFLY (YieldMax NFLX Option Income Strategy ETF) and SBIT (Proshares Ultrashort Bitcoin ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - NFLY is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by YieldMax, while SBIT is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the Bloomberg Bitcoin Index (-200%). NFLY is actively managed, while SBIT is passively managed. Over the past year, NFLY returned -34.29% vs 124.12% for SBIT. At a correlation of -0.24, they often move in opposite directions. NFLY charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for SBIT.
Performance
NFLY vs. SBIT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NFLY achieves a -17.03% return, which is significantly lower than SBIT's 44.00% return.
NFLY
- 1D
- 1.15%
- 1M
- -8.16%
- 6M
- -13.66%
- YTD
- -17.03%
- 1Y
- -34.29%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SBIT
- 1D
- 5.38%
- 1M
- 1.44%
- 6M
- 58.27%
- YTD
- 44.00%
- 1Y
- 124.12%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NFLY vs. SBIT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
NFLY YieldMax NFLX Option Income Strategy ETF | -17.03% | 1.66% | 38.49% |
SBIT Proshares Ultrashort Bitcoin ETF | 44.00% | -25.11% | -73.74% |
Correlation
The correlation between NFLY and SBIT is -0.15, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.15 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 2, 2024 | -0.24 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NFLY vs. SBIT — Risk / Return Rank
NFLY
SBIT
NFLY vs. SBIT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax NFLX Option Income Strategy ETF (NFLY) and Proshares Ultrashort Bitcoin ETF (SBIT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| NFLY | SBIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.62 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.82 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.77 | 1.25 | -0.47 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.92 | 2.60 | -3.53 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.64 | 5.92 | -7.56 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
NFLY vs. SBIT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NFLY drawdown since its inception was -39.68%, smaller than the maximum SBIT drawdown of -91.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NFLY and SBIT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NFLY | SBIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -39.68% | -91.35% | +51.67% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -37.23% | -47.94% | +10.71% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -38.39% | -77.15% | +38.76% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.46% | -68.83% | +59.37% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 20.92% | 21.04% | -0.12% |
Volatility
NFLY vs. SBIT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for YieldMax NFLX Option Income Strategy ETF (NFLY) is 9.46%, while Proshares Ultrashort Bitcoin ETF (SBIT) has a volatility of 22.98%. This indicates that NFLY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SBIT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NFLY | SBIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.46% | 22.98% | -13.52% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 22.09% | 68.89% | -46.80% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 28.68% | 88.51% | -59.83% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 28.36% | 96.89% | -68.53% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 28.36% | 96.89% | -68.53% |
NFLY vs. SBIT - Expense Ratio Comparison
NFLY has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than SBIT's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
NFLY vs. SBIT - Dividend Comparison
NFLY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 64.97%, more than SBIT's 3.97% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
NFLY YieldMax NFLX Option Income Strategy ETF | 64.97% | 61.53% | 49.91% | 11.84% |
SBIT Proshares Ultrashort Bitcoin ETF | 3.97% | 0.52% | 1.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NFLY and SBIT have a correlation of -0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SBIT has higher volatility (22.98%) compared to NFLY (9.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NFLY dropped -39.68% vs SBIT's -91.35%.
On 1-year performance, SBIT leads with 124.12% vs -34.29% for NFLY. On fees, SBIT is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, NFLY has been the lower-risk option at 9.46%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, SBIT has performed better with a 124.12% return vs -34.29%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SBIT is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for NFLY.
NFLY has the higher dividend yield at 64.97%, compared with 3.97% for SBIT.
NFLY is categorized as Derivative Income, while SBIT is Cryptocurrency. They also come from different issuers: YieldMax and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for NFLY and 0.95% for SBIT.
SBIT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.41 vs -1.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for NFLY and SBIT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer