NFLY vs. MSTY
NFLY (YieldMax NFLX Option Income Strategy ETF) and MSTY (YieldMax™ MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF) are both Derivative Income funds from YieldMax. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, NFLY returned -35.40% vs -66.58% for MSTY. At a 0.30 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.99% expense ratio.
Performance
NFLY vs. MSTY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NFLY achieves a -16.92% return, which is significantly higher than MSTY's -27.80% return.
NFLY
- 1D
- -0.25%
- 1M
- -14.75%
- YTD
- -16.92%
- 6M
- -16.28%
- 1Y
- -35.40%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MSTY
- 1D
- -4.55%
- 1M
- -31.74%
- YTD
- -27.80%
- 6M
- -29.80%
- 1Y
- -66.58%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NFLY vs. MSTY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
NFLY YieldMax NFLX Option Income Strategy ETF | -16.92% | 1.66% | 50.13% |
MSTY YieldMax™ MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF | -27.80% | -42.71% | 212.16% |
Correlation
The correlation between NFLY and MSTY is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 22, 2024 | 0.30 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NFLY vs. MSTY — Risk / Return Rank
NFLY
MSTY
NFLY vs. MSTY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax NFLX Option Income Strategy ETF (NFLY) and YieldMax™ MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF (MSTY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| NFLY | MSTY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.18 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.12 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.76 | 0.79 | -0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.93 | -0.93 | 0.00 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.62 | -1.35 | -0.27 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
NFLY vs. MSTY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NFLY drawdown since its inception was -38.31%, smaller than the maximum MSTY drawdown of -71.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NFLY and MSTY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NFLY | MSTY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.31% | -71.79% | +33.48% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -38.31% | -71.79% | +33.48% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -38.31% | -71.62% | +33.31% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.95% | -26.97% | +18.02% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 21.92% | 49.36% | -27.44% |
Volatility
NFLY vs. MSTY - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for YieldMax NFLX Option Income Strategy ETF (NFLY) is 6.90%, while YieldMax™ MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF (MSTY) has a volatility of 19.32%. This indicates that NFLY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MSTY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NFLY | MSTY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.90% | 19.32% | -12.42% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 21.19% | 49.66% | -28.47% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 28.31% | 62.02% | -33.71% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 28.33% | 71.82% | -43.49% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 28.33% | 71.82% | -43.49% |
NFLY vs. MSTY - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both NFLY and MSTY have an expense ratio of 0.99%.
Dividends
NFLY vs. MSTY - Dividend Comparison
NFLY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 67.16%, less than MSTY's 286.06% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
MSTY YieldMax™ MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF | 286.06% | 294.61% | 104.56% | 0.00% |
NFLY YieldMax NFLX Option Income Strategy ETF | 67.16% | 61.53% | 49.91% | 11.84% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NFLY and MSTY have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MSTY has higher volatility (19.32%) compared to NFLY (6.90%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NFLY dropped -38.31% vs MSTY's -71.79%.
On 1-year performance, NFLY leads with -35.40% vs -66.58% for MSTY. Both ETFs have the same 0.99% expense ratio. On volatility, NFLY has been the lower-risk option at 6.90%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, NFLY has performed better with a -35.40% return vs -66.58%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
NFLY and MSTY have the same expense ratio: 0.99% per year.
MSTY has the higher dividend yield at 286.06%, compared with 67.16% for NFLY.
MSTY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-1.08 vs -1.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for NFLY and MSTY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer