NFLY vs. MSTY
NFLY (YieldMax NFLX Option Income Strategy ETF) and MSTY (YieldMax™ MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF) are both Derivative Income funds from YieldMax. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, NFLY returned -26.13% vs -57.30% for MSTY. At a 0.29 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.99% expense ratio.
Performance
NFLY vs. MSTY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NFLY achieves a -7.02% return, which is significantly higher than MSTY's -8.55% return.
NFLY
- 1D
- -2.44%
- 1M
- -6.88%
- YTD
- -7.02%
- 6M
- -17.50%
- 1Y
- -26.13%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MSTY
- 1D
- -8.50%
- 1M
- -20.82%
- YTD
- -8.55%
- 6M
- -19.25%
- 1Y
- -57.30%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NFLY vs. MSTY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
NFLY YieldMax NFLX Option Income Strategy ETF | -7.02% | 1.66% | 45.62% |
MSTY YieldMax™ MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF | -8.55% | -42.71% | 200.20% |
Correlation
The correlation between NFLY and MSTY is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 23, 2024 | 0.29 |
The correlation between NFLY and MSTY shifts across timeframes, from 0.18 (1 year) to 0.29 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NFLY vs. MSTY — Risk / Return Rank
NFLY
MSTY
NFLY vs. MSTY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax NFLX Option Income Strategy ETF (NFLY) and YieldMax™ MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF (MSTY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| NFLY | MSTY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.95 | -0.96 | +0.01 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.29 | -1.53 | +0.24 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.83 | 0.83 | 0.00 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.69 | -0.79 | +0.10 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.25 | -1.22 | -0.03 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NFLY | MSTY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.95 | -0.96 | +0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.67 | 0.31 | +0.36 |
Drawdowns
NFLY vs. MSTY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NFLY drawdown since its inception was -37.18%, smaller than the maximum MSTY drawdown of -71.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NFLY and MSTY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NFLY | MSTY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -37.18% | -71.79% | +34.61% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -37.18% | -71.79% | +34.61% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -30.95% | -64.04% | +33.09% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.47% | -26.01% | +17.54% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 20.45% | 46.68% | -26.23% |
Volatility
NFLY vs. MSTY - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for YieldMax NFLX Option Income Strategy ETF (NFLY) is 5.92%, while YieldMax™ MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF (MSTY) has a volatility of 16.65%. This indicates that NFLY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MSTY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NFLY | MSTY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.92% | 16.65% | -10.73% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 21.11% | 48.38% | -27.27% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 27.62% | 60.11% | -32.49% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 28.31% | 71.83% | -43.52% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 28.31% | 71.83% | -43.52% |
NFLY vs. MSTY - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both NFLY and MSTY have an expense ratio of 0.99%.
Dividends
NFLY vs. MSTY - Dividend Comparison
NFLY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 57.09%, less than MSTY's 251.24% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
MSTY YieldMax™ MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF | 251.24% | 294.61% | 104.56% | 0.00% |
NFLY YieldMax NFLX Option Income Strategy ETF | 57.09% | 61.53% | 49.91% | 11.84% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NFLY and MSTY have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MSTY has higher volatility (16.65%) compared to NFLY (5.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NFLY dropped -37.18% vs MSTY's -71.79%.
On 1-year performance, NFLY leads with -26.13% vs -57.30% for MSTY. Both ETFs have the same 0.99% expense ratio. On volatility, NFLY has been the lower-risk option at 5.92%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, NFLY has performed better with a -26.13% return vs -57.30%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
NFLY and MSTY have the same expense ratio: 0.99% per year.
MSTY has the higher dividend yield at 251.24%, compared with 57.09% for NFLY.
NFLY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.95 vs -0.96), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for NFLY and MSTY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer