NFLY vs. FIVY
NFLY (YieldMax NFLX Option Income Strategy ETF) and FIVY (YieldMax Dorsey Wright Hybrid 5 Income ETF) are both Derivative Income funds from YieldMax. NFLY is actively managed, while FIVY is passively managed. Over the past year, NFLY returned -26.13% vs -4.47% for FIVY. At a 0.38 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. NFLY charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.88%/yr for FIVY.
Performance
NFLY vs. FIVY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NFLY achieves a -7.02% return, which is significantly lower than FIVY's -4.84% return.
NFLY
- 1D
- -2.44%
- 1M
- -6.88%
- YTD
- -7.02%
- 6M
- -17.50%
- 1Y
- -26.13%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FIVY
- 1D
- -1.16%
- 1M
- 3.94%
- YTD
- -4.84%
- 6M
- -7.64%
- 1Y
- -4.47%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NFLY vs. FIVY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
NFLY YieldMax NFLX Option Income Strategy ETF | -7.02% | 1.66% | -2.67% |
FIVY YieldMax Dorsey Wright Hybrid 5 Income ETF | -4.84% | -1.07% | -9.94% |
Correlation
The correlation between NFLY and FIVY is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 18, 2024 | 0.38 |
The correlation between NFLY and FIVY shifts across timeframes, from 0.22 (1 year) to 0.38 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NFLY vs. FIVY — Risk / Return Rank
NFLY
FIVY
NFLY vs. FIVY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax NFLX Option Income Strategy ETF (NFLY) and YieldMax Dorsey Wright Hybrid 5 Income ETF (FIVY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| NFLY | FIVY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.95 | -0.15 | -0.80 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.29 | 0.00 | -1.29 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.83 | 1.00 | -0.17 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.69 | -0.12 | -0.57 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.25 | -0.25 | -1.00 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NFLY | FIVY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.95 | -0.15 | -0.80 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.67 | -0.33 | +1.00 |
Drawdowns
NFLY vs. FIVY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NFLY drawdown since its inception was -37.18%, which is greater than FIVY's maximum drawdown of -32.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NFLY and FIVY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NFLY | FIVY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -37.18% | -32.77% | -4.41% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -37.18% | -32.77% | -4.41% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -30.95% | -18.80% | -12.15% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.47% | -13.09% | +4.62% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 20.45% | 15.79% | +4.66% |
Volatility
NFLY vs. FIVY - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for YieldMax NFLX Option Income Strategy ETF (NFLY) is 5.92%, while YieldMax Dorsey Wright Hybrid 5 Income ETF (FIVY) has a volatility of 8.05%. This indicates that NFLY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FIVY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NFLY | FIVY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.92% | 8.05% | -2.13% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 21.11% | 21.14% | -0.03% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 27.62% | 30.25% | -2.63% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 28.31% | 32.82% | -4.51% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 28.31% | 32.82% | -4.51% |
NFLY vs. FIVY - Expense Ratio Comparison
NFLY has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than FIVY's 0.88% expense ratio.
Dividends
NFLY vs. FIVY - Dividend Comparison
NFLY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 57.09%, more than FIVY's 49.19% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
FIVY YieldMax Dorsey Wright Hybrid 5 Income ETF | 49.19% | 46.51% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
NFLY YieldMax NFLX Option Income Strategy ETF | 57.09% | 61.53% | 49.91% | 11.84% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NFLY and FIVY have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FIVY has higher volatility (8.05%) compared to NFLY (5.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NFLY dropped -37.18% vs FIVY's -32.77%.
On 1-year performance, FIVY leads with -4.47% vs -26.13% for NFLY. On fees, FIVY is cheaper at 0.88% per year. On volatility, NFLY has been the lower-risk option at 5.92%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, FIVY has performed better with a -4.47% return vs -26.13%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FIVY is cheaper with a 0.88% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for NFLY.
NFLY has the higher dividend yield at 57.09%, compared with 49.19% for FIVY.
Their fees differ too: 0.99% for NFLY and 0.88% for FIVY.
FIVY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.15 vs -0.95), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for NFLY and FIVY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer