PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NFLY vs. BITI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NFLY vs. BITI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in YieldMax NFLX Option Income Strategy ETF (NFLY) and ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF (BITI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NFLY achieves a -17.04% return, which is significantly lower than BITI's 24.48% return.


NFLY

1D
1.02%
1M
-6.93%
6M
-12.86%
YTD
-17.04%
1Y
-34.80%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

BITI

1D
1.13%
1M
1.49%
6M
35.86%
YTD
24.48%
1Y
64.61%
3Y*
-31.62%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NFLY vs. BITI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
NFLY
YieldMax NFLX Option Income Strategy ETF
-17.04%1.66%66.37%3.80%
BITI
ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF
24.48%-1.76%-62.60%-32.44%

Correlation

The correlation between NFLY and BITI is -0.15, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.15

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 8, 2023

-0.23

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NFLY vs. BITI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NFLY
NFLY Risk / Return Rank: 11
Overall Rank
NFLY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 00
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NFLY Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
Sortino Ratio Rank
NFLY Omega Ratio Rank: 11
Omega Ratio Rank
NFLY Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
NFLY Martin Ratio Rank: 00
Martin Ratio Rank

BITI
BITI Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
BITI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BITI Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
BITI Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
BITI Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
BITI Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NFLY vs. BITI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax NFLX Option Income Strategy ETF (NFLY) and ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF (BITI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


NFLYBITIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.69

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.84

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.77

1.25

-0.48

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.94

2.57

-3.51

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.64

6.38

-8.01

NFLY vs. BITI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NFLY Sharpe Ratio is -1.22, which is lower than the BITI Sharpe Ratio of 1.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NFLY and BITI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NFLY vs. BITI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NFLY drawdown since its inception was -39.68%, smaller than the maximum BITI drawdown of -92.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NFLY and BITI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NFLYBITIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.68%

-92.16%

+52.48%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-37.23%

-25.28%

-11.95%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-84.63%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-38.39%

-86.41%

+48.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.58%

-68.40%

+58.82%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

21.29%

10.16%

+11.13%

Volatility

NFLY vs. BITI - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for YieldMax NFLX Option Income Strategy ETF (NFLY) is 9.37%, while ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF (BITI) has a volatility of 10.76%. This indicates that NFLY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BITI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NFLYBITIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.37%

10.76%

-1.39%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

22.10%

34.28%

-12.18%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

28.62%

44.15%

-15.53%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

28.31%

52.24%

-23.93%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

28.31%

52.24%

-23.93%

NFLY vs. BITI - Expense Ratio Comparison

NFLY has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is lower than BITI's 1.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

NFLY vs. BITI - Dividend Comparison

NFLY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 65.80%, more than BITI's 15.62% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
BITI
ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF
15.62%1.60%3.91%3.33%0.06%
NFLY
YieldMax NFLX Option Income Strategy ETF
65.80%61.53%49.91%11.84%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


NFLY and BITI have a correlation of -0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BITI has higher volatility (10.76%) compared to NFLY (9.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NFLY dropped -39.68% vs BITI's -92.16%.

On 1-year performance, BITI leads with 64.61% vs -34.80% for NFLY. On fees, NFLY is cheaper at 0.99% per year. On volatility, NFLY has been the lower-risk option at 9.37%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, BITI has performed better with a 64.61% return vs -34.80%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

NFLY is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 1.03% for BITI.

NFLY has the higher dividend yield at 65.80%, compared with 15.62% for BITI.

NFLY is categorized as Derivative Income, while BITI is Cryptocurrency. They also come from different issuers: YieldMax and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for NFLY and 1.03% for BITI.

BITI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.47 vs -1.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NFLY and BITI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer