PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
NFLX vs. XGD.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

NFLX vs. XGD.TO

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

NFLX (Netflix, Inc.) is a stock, while XGD.TO (iShares S&P/TSX Global Gold Index ETF) is Gold fund tracking the S&P/TSX Global Gold Index. Over the past 10 years, NFLX returned 23.92%/yr vs 13.24%/yr for XGD.TO. At a 0.08 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

NFLX vs. XGD.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Netflix, Inc. (NFLX) and iShares S&P/TSX Global Gold Index ETF (XGD.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

NFLX is traded in USD, while XGD.TO is traded in CAD. To make them comparable, the XGD.TO values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NFLX achieves a -14.31% return, which is significantly lower than XGD.TO's -4.15% return. Over the past 10 years, NFLX has outperformed XGD.TO with an annualized return of 23.92%, while XGD.TO has yielded a comparatively lower 13.24% annualized return.

NFLX

1D
-1.14%
1M
-7.68%
YTD
-14.31%
6M
-15.60%
1Y
-33.72%
3Y*
22.62%
5Y*
10.45%
10Y*
23.92%

XGD.TO

1D
2.80%
1M
-14.79%
YTD
-4.15%
6M
-2.94%
1Y
52.19%
3Y*
39.77%
5Y*
17.63%
10Y*
13.24%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NFLX vs. XGD.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NFLX
Netflix, Inc.		-14.31%5.19%83.07%65.11%-51.05%11.41%67.11%20.89%39.44%55.06%
XGD.TO
iShares S&P/TSX Global Gold Index ETF		-4.15%156.14%10.29%6.44%-8.90%-5.76%24.05%46.20%-11.54%8.29%

Correlation

The correlation between NFLX and XGD.TO is 0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.07

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.12

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.12

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.08

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 12, 2006

0.08

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Netflix, Inc.

iShares S&P/TSX Global Gold Index ETF

Often compared with NFLX:
NFLX vs. NVDANFLX vs. SPYNFLX vs. TSLANFLX vs. AAPLNFLX vs. MSFTNFLX vs. NFLYNFLX vs. WBD
Often compared with XGD.TO:
XGD.TO vs. CGL.TOXGD.TO vs. GLDXGD.TO vs. ZGD.TOXGD.TO vs. MNT.TOXGD.TO vs. BRK-BXGD.TO vs. ZGLD.TOXGD.TO vs. ZGLD.SW

Return for Risk

NFLX vs. XGD.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
NFLX
NFLX Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
NFLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NFLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
Sortino Ratio Rank
NFLX Omega Ratio Rank: 77
Omega Ratio Rank
NFLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
NFLX Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank
XGD.TO
XGD.TO Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
XGD.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XGD.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
XGD.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
XGD.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
XGD.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NFLX vs. XGD.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Netflix, Inc. (NFLX) and iShares S&P/TSX Global Gold Index ETF (XGD.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

NFLXXGD.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
-1.03
1.26

-2.29

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
-1.46
1.68

-3.13

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.81

1.24

-0.42

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.78

1.63

-2.42

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.35

4.62

-5.96

NFLX vs. XGD.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NFLX Sharpe Ratio is -1.03, which is lower than the XGD.TO Sharpe Ratio of 1.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NFLX and XGD.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NFLX vs. XGD.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NFLX drawdown since its inception was -81.99%, roughly equal to the maximum XGD.TO drawdown of -80.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NFLX and XGD.TO.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

NFLXXGD.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-81.99%

-80.30%

-1.69%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-43.35%

-34.40%

-8.95%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-43.35%

-34.40%

-8.95%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-75.95%

-44.90%

-31.05%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-75.95%

-47.12%

-28.83%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-40.01%

-29.14%

-10.87%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-24.91%

-40.83%

+15.92%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

25.19%

12.14%

+13.05%

Volatility

NFLX vs. XGD.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Netflix, Inc. (NFLX) is 5.85%, while iShares S&P/TSX Global Gold Index ETF (XGD.TO) has a volatility of 16.18%. This indicates that NFLX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XGD.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

NFLXXGD.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.85%

16.18%

-10.33%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

24.58%

36.18%

-11.60%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

33.05%

44.62%

-11.57%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

43.09%

33.65%

+9.44%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

41.49%

34.19%

+7.30%

Dividends

NFLX vs. XGD.TO - Dividend Comparison

NFLX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XGD.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.64%.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NFLX
Netflix, Inc.		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XGD.TO
iShares S&P/TSX Global Gold Index ETF		0.64%0.62%0.93%1.49%1.77%1.38%0.35%0.54%0.25%0.14%0.10%0.57%

Frequently Asked Questions

NFLX and XGD.TO have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NFLX and XGD.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer