NFLX vs. SNOW
NFLX (Netflix, Inc.) and SNOW (Snowflake Inc.) are both stocks. NFLX operates in Entertainment (Communication Services), while SNOW operates in Software - Application (Technology). Over the past 5 years, NFLX returned 11.21%/yr vs -0.54%/yr for SNOW. At a 0.41 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
NFLX vs. SNOW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NFLX achieves a -11.86% return, which is significantly lower than SNOW's 9.61% return.
NFLX
- 1D
- 0.56%
- 1M
- -5.54%
- YTD
- -11.86%
- 6M
- -14.62%
- 1Y
- -33.43%
- 3Y*
- 25.31%
- 5Y*
- 11.21%
- 10Y*
- 24.31%
SNOW
- 1D
- 0.92%
- 1M
- 57.72%
- YTD
- 9.61%
- 6M
- 6.72%
- 1Y
- 14.04%
- 3Y*
- 12.11%
- 5Y*
- -0.54%
- 10Y*
- —
NFLX vs. SNOW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NFLX Netflix, Inc. | -11.86% | 5.19% | 83.07% | 65.11% | -51.05% | 11.41% | 11.75% |
SNOW Snowflake Inc. | 9.61% | 42.06% | -22.41% | 38.64% | -57.63% | 20.38% | 10.82% |
Correlation
The correlation between NFLX and SNOW is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 17, 2020 | 0.41 |
Over the past year, the correlation between NFLX and SNOW has dropped to 0.16 - well below their long-term average of 0.41, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Fundamentals
NFLX:
$355.22B
SNOW:
$83.05B
NFLX:
$3.09
SNOW:
-$3.53
NFLX:
7.62
SNOW:
16.21
NFLX:
11.41
SNOW:
40.30
NFLX:
$46.89B
SNOW:
$5.03B
NFLX:
$22.99B
SNOW:
$3.38B
NFLX:
$26.91B
SNOW:
-$1.21B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NFLX vs. SNOW — Risk / Return Rank
NFLX
SNOW
NFLX vs. SNOW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Netflix, Inc. (NFLX) and Snowflake Inc. (SNOW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| NFLX | SNOW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.23 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.31 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.82 | 1.11 | -0.30 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.77 | 0.25 | -1.02 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.36 | 0.54 | -1.90 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NFLX | SNOW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -1.01 | 0.22 | -1.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.26 | -0.01 | +0.27 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.59 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.58 | -0.02 | +0.59 |
Drawdowns
NFLX vs. SNOW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NFLX drawdown since its inception was -81.99%, which is greater than SNOW's maximum drawdown of -72.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NFLX and SNOW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NFLX | SNOW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -81.99% | -72.99% | -9.00% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -43.35% | -56.30% | +12.95% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -43.35% | -56.30% | +12.95% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -75.95% | -72.99% | -2.96% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -75.95% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -38.29% | -40.17% | +1.88% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -24.90% | -49.08% | +24.18% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 24.70% | 25.86% | -1.16% |
Volatility
NFLX vs. SNOW - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Netflix, Inc. (NFLX) is 6.64%, while Snowflake Inc. (SNOW) has a volatility of 35.49%. This indicates that NFLX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SNOW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NFLX | SNOW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.64% | 35.49% | -28.85% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 25.22% | 52.71% | -27.49% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 33.15% | 65.40% | -32.25% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 43.10% | 61.91% | -18.81% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 41.52% | 62.75% | -21.23% |
Dividends
NFLX vs. SNOW - Dividend Comparison
Neither NFLX nor SNOW has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
NFLX vs. SNOW - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Netflix, Inc. and Snowflake Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
NFLX vs. SNOW - Profitability Comparison
NFLX - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Netflix, Inc. reported a gross profit of 6.36B and revenue of 12.25B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 51.9%.
SNOW - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Snowflake Inc. reported a gross profit of 926.45M and revenue of 1.39B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 66.6%.
NFLX - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Netflix, Inc. reported an operating income of 3.96B and revenue of 12.25B, resulting in an operating margin of 32.3%.
SNOW - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Snowflake Inc. reported an operating income of -326.15M and revenue of 1.39B, resulting in an operating margin of -23.5%.
NFLX - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Netflix, Inc. reported a net income of 5.28B and revenue of 12.25B, resulting in a net margin of 43.1%.
SNOW - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Snowflake Inc. reported a net income of -295.57M and revenue of 1.39B, resulting in a net margin of -21.3%.
Frequently Asked Questions
NFLX and SNOW have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SNOW has higher volatility (35.49%) compared to NFLX (6.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NFLX dropped -81.99% vs SNOW's -72.99%.
SNOW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.22 vs -1.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for NFLX and SNOW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer