PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NFLX vs. MRVL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

NFLX vs. MRVL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Netflix, Inc. (NFLX) and Marvell Technology, Inc. (MRVL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NFLX achieves a -27.90% return, which is significantly lower than MRVL's 129.73% return. Over the past 10 years, NFLX has underperformed MRVL with an annualized return of 22.91%, while MRVL has yielded a comparatively higher 33.45% annualized return.


NFLX

1D
-1.96%
1M
-12.64%
6M
-23.18%
YTD
-27.90%
1Y
-44.10%
3Y*
16.50%
5Y*
5.65%
10Y*
22.91%
ALL TIME*
30.17%

MRVL

1D
3.32%
1M
-37.22%
6M
142.46%
YTD
129.73%
1Y
161.70%
3Y*
45.86%
5Y*
27.77%
10Y*
33.45%
ALL TIME*
11.38%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NFLX vs. MRVL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NFLX
Netflix, Inc.
-27.90%5.19%83.07%65.11%-51.05%11.41%67.11%20.89%39.44%55.06%
MRVL
Marvell Technology, Inc.
129.73%-22.82%83.79%63.68%-57.48%84.62%80.25%65.74%-23.62%56.89%

Correlation

The correlation between NFLX and MRVL is -0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.01

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.25

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.36

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.36

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 23, 2002

0.31

The correlation between NFLX and MRVL shifts across timeframes, from -0.01 (1 year) to 0.36 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

NFLX:

$284.65B

MRVL:

$170.72B

EPS

NFLX:

$3.17

MRVL:

$2.90

PE Ratio

NFLX:

21.32

MRVL:

67.31

PEG Ratio

NFLX:

0.84

MRVL:

0.12

PS Ratio

NFLX:

6.02

MRVL:

19.51

PB Ratio

NFLX:

9.55

MRVL:

9.56

Total Revenue (TTM)

NFLX:

$48.37B

MRVL:

$8.72B

Gross Profit (TTM)

NFLX:

$23.76B

MRVL:

$4.41B

EBITDA (TTM)

NFLX:

$30.55B

MRVL:

$4.27B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NFLX vs. MRVL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NFLX
NFLX Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
NFLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NFLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
NFLX Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
NFLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
NFLX Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank

MRVL
MRVL Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
MRVL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MRVL Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
MRVL Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
MRVL Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
MRVL Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NFLX vs. MRVL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Netflix, Inc. (NFLX) and Marvell Technology, Inc. (MRVL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


NFLXMRVLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-3.42

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-4.64

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.75

1.36

-0.60

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.95

4.02

-4.97

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.76

12.20

-13.96

NFLX vs. MRVL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NFLX Sharpe Ratio is -1.27, which is lower than the MRVL Sharpe Ratio of 2.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NFLX and MRVL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NFLX vs. MRVL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NFLX drawdown since its inception was -81.99%, smaller than the maximum MRVL drawdown of -91.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NFLX and MRVL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NFLXMRVLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-81.99%

-91.60%

+9.61%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-46.49%

-40.48%

-6.01%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-49.52%

-60.79%

+11.27%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-75.95%

-61.88%

-14.07%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-75.95%

-61.88%

-14.07%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-49.52%

-38.38%

-11.14%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-24.98%

-46.64%

+21.66%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

25.06%

13.32%

+11.74%

Volatility

NFLX vs. MRVL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Netflix, Inc. (NFLX) is 13.34%, while Marvell Technology, Inc. (MRVL) has a volatility of 26.62%. This indicates that NFLX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MRVL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NFLXMRVLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.34%

26.62%

-13.28%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

27.81%

62.78%

-34.97%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

34.79%

76.08%

-41.29%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

43.50%

63.26%

-19.76%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

41.38%

52.55%

-11.17%

Dividends

NFLX vs. MRVL - Dividend Comparison

NFLX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MRVL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.12%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MRVL
Marvell Technology, Inc.
0.12%0.28%0.22%0.40%0.65%0.21%0.50%0.90%1.48%1.12%1.73%2.72%
NFLX
Netflix, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

NFLX vs. MRVL - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Netflix, Inc. and Marvell Technology, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


2.00B4.00B6.00B8.00B10.00B12.00B20222023202420252026
12.56B
2.42B
(NFLX) Total Revenue
(MRVL) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

NFLX vs. MRVL - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Netflix, Inc. and Marvell Technology, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

20.0%25.0%30.0%35.0%40.0%45.0%50.0%55.0%20222023202420252026
51.9%
52.2%
Portfolio components
NFLX - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Netflix, Inc. reported a gross profit of 6.52B and revenue of 12.56B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 51.9%.

MRVL - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Marvell Technology, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.26B and revenue of 2.42B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 52.2%.

NFLX - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Netflix, Inc. reported an operating income of 4.19B and revenue of 12.56B, resulting in an operating margin of 33.4%.

MRVL - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Marvell Technology, Inc. reported an operating income of 339.40M and revenue of 2.42B, resulting in an operating margin of 14.0%.

NFLX - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Netflix, Inc. reported a net income of 3.40B and revenue of 12.56B, resulting in a net margin of 27.1%.

MRVL - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Marvell Technology, Inc. reported a net income of 34.50M and revenue of 2.42B, resulting in a net margin of 1.4%.


Frequently Asked Questions


NFLX and MRVL have a correlation of -0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MRVL has higher volatility (26.62%) compared to NFLX (13.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NFLX dropped -81.99% vs MRVL's -91.60%.

MRVL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.14 vs -1.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NFLX and MRVL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer