NFLX vs. IBDV
NFLX (Netflix, Inc.) is a stock, while IBDV (iShares iBonds Dec 2030 Term Corporate ETF) is Corporate Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg December 2030 Maturity Corporate Index. Over the past 5 years, NFLX returned 10.45%/yr vs 0.77%/yr for IBDV. At a 0.20 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
NFLX vs. IBDV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NFLX achieves a -14.31% return, which is significantly lower than IBDV's 0.41% return.
NFLX
- 1D
- -1.14%
- 1M
- -7.68%
- YTD
- -14.31%
- 6M
- -15.60%
- 1Y
- -33.72%
- 3Y*
- 22.62%
- 5Y*
- 10.45%
- 10Y*
- 23.92%
IBDV
- 1D
- -0.07%
- 1M
- 0.56%
- YTD
- 0.41%
- 6M
- 0.90%
- 1Y
- 4.79%
- 3Y*
- 5.90%
- 5Y*
- 0.77%
- 10Y*
- —
NFLX vs. IBDV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NFLX Netflix, Inc. | -14.31% | 5.19% | 83.07% | 65.11% | -51.05% | 11.41% | 18.10% |
IBDV iShares iBonds Dec 2030 Term Corporate ETF | 0.41% | 8.19% | 3.42% | 8.51% | -14.67% | -2.64% | 5.22% |
Correlation
The correlation between NFLX and IBDV is -0.00, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.00 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 25, 2020 | 0.20 |
The correlation between NFLX and IBDV shifts across timeframes, from -0.00 (1 year) to 0.20 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NFLX vs. IBDV — Risk / Return Rank
NFLX
IBDV
NFLX vs. IBDV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Netflix, Inc. (NFLX) and iShares iBonds Dec 2030 Term Corporate ETF (IBDV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| NFLX | IBDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.62 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.92 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.81 | 1.29 | -0.48 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.78 | 2.21 | -2.99 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.35 | 7.41 | -8.75 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
NFLX vs. IBDV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NFLX drawdown since its inception was -81.99%, which is greater than IBDV's maximum drawdown of -21.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NFLX and IBDV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NFLX | IBDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -81.99% | -21.85% | -60.14% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -43.35% | -2.07% | -41.28% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -43.35% | -5.64% | -37.71% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -75.95% | -21.54% | -54.41% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -75.95% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -40.01% | -0.81% | -39.20% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -24.91% | -7.19% | -17.72% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 25.19% | 0.62% | +24.57% |
Volatility
NFLX vs. IBDV - Volatility Comparison
Netflix, Inc. (NFLX) has a higher volatility of 5.85% compared to iShares iBonds Dec 2030 Term Corporate ETF (IBDV) at 0.93%. This indicates that NFLX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IBDV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NFLX | IBDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.85% | 0.93% | +4.92% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 24.58% | 2.04% | +22.54% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 33.05% | 2.87% | +30.18% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 43.09% | 6.44% | +36.65% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 41.49% | 6.25% | +35.24% |
Dividends
NFLX vs. IBDV - Dividend Comparison
NFLX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IBDV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.59%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IBDV iShares iBonds Dec 2030 Term Corporate ETF | 4.59% | 4.57% | 4.69% | 4.09% | 3.02% | 1.99% | 0.90% |
NFLX Netflix, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NFLX and IBDV have a correlation of -0.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NFLX has higher volatility (5.85%) compared to IBDV (0.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NFLX dropped -81.99% vs IBDV's -21.85%.
IBDV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.59 vs -1.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for NFLX and IBDV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer