NFLX vs. AVAV
NFLX (Netflix, Inc.) and AVAV (AeroVironment, Inc.) are both stocks. NFLX operates in Entertainment (Communication Services), while AVAV operates in Aerospace & Defense (Industrials). Over the past 10 years, NFLX returned 22.91%/yr vs 17.89%/yr for AVAV. At a 0.24 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
NFLX vs. AVAV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NFLX achieves a -27.90% return, which is significantly higher than AVAV's -41.05% return. Over the past 10 years, NFLX has outperformed AVAV with an annualized return of 22.91%, while AVAV has yielded a comparatively lower 17.89% annualized return.
NFLX
- 1D
- -1.96%
- 1M
- -12.64%
- 6M
- -23.18%
- YTD
- -27.90%
- 1Y
- -44.10%
- 3Y*
- 16.50%
- 5Y*
- 5.65%
- 10Y*
- 22.91%
- ALL TIME*
- 30.17%
AVAV
- 1D
- 0.28%
- 1M
- -15.92%
- 6M
- -63.70%
- YTD
- -41.05%
- 1Y
- -47.96%
- 3Y*
- 13.91%
- 5Y*
- 7.74%
- 10Y*
- 17.89%
- ALL TIME*
- 9.35%
NFLX vs. AVAV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NFLX Netflix, Inc. | -27.90% | 5.19% | 83.07% | 65.11% | -51.05% | 11.41% | 67.11% | 20.89% | 39.44% | 55.06% |
AVAV AeroVironment, Inc. | -41.05% | 57.18% | 22.10% | 47.14% | 38.09% | -28.62% | 40.75% | -9.14% | 20.99% | 109.32% |
Correlation
The correlation between NFLX and AVAV is 0.11, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 23, 2007 | 0.24 |
The correlation between NFLX and AVAV shifts across timeframes, from 0.11 (1 year) to 0.24 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
NFLX:
$284.65B
AVAV:
$7.22B
NFLX:
$3.17
AVAV:
-$5.41
NFLX:
6.02
AVAV:
4.93
NFLX:
9.55
AVAV:
1.64
NFLX:
$48.37B
AVAV:
$1.42B
NFLX:
$23.76B
AVAV:
$246.70M
NFLX:
$30.55B
AVAV:
-$6.04M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NFLX vs. AVAV — Risk / Return Rank
NFLX
AVAV
NFLX vs. AVAV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Netflix, Inc. (NFLX) and AeroVironment, Inc. (AVAV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| NFLX | AVAV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.62 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.22 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.75 | 0.91 | -0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.95 | -0.72 | -0.23 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.76 | -1.22 | -0.54 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
NFLX vs. AVAV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NFLX drawdown since its inception was -81.99%, which is greater than AVAV's maximum drawdown of -66.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NFLX and AVAV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NFLX | AVAV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -81.99% | -66.65% | -15.34% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -46.49% | -66.65% | +20.16% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -49.52% | -66.65% | +17.13% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -75.95% | -66.65% | -9.30% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -75.95% | -66.65% | -9.30% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -49.52% | -65.21% | +15.69% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -24.98% | -28.88% | +3.90% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 25.06% | 39.22% | -14.16% |
Volatility
NFLX vs. AVAV - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Netflix, Inc. (NFLX) is 13.34%, while AeroVironment, Inc. (AVAV) has a volatility of 29.43%. This indicates that NFLX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AVAV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NFLX | AVAV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.34% | 29.43% | -16.09% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 27.81% | 60.09% | -32.28% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 34.79% | 73.41% | -38.62% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 43.50% | 57.39% | -13.89% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 41.38% | 52.82% | -11.44% |
Dividends
NFLX vs. AVAV - Dividend Comparison
Neither NFLX nor AVAV has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
NFLX vs. AVAV - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Netflix, Inc. and AeroVironment, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
NFLX vs. AVAV - Profitability Comparison
NFLX - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Netflix, Inc. reported a gross profit of 6.52B and revenue of 12.56B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 51.9%.
AVAV - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, AeroVironment, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 80.12M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
NFLX - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Netflix, Inc. reported an operating income of 4.19B and revenue of 12.56B, resulting in an operating margin of 33.4%.
AVAV - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, AeroVironment, Inc. reported an operating income of 56.94M and revenue of 80.12M, resulting in an operating margin of 71.1%.
NFLX - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Netflix, Inc. reported a net income of 3.40B and revenue of 12.56B, resulting in a net margin of 27.1%.
AVAV - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, AeroVironment, Inc. reported a net income of -24.10M and revenue of 80.12M, resulting in a net margin of -30.1%.
Frequently Asked Questions
NFLX and AVAV have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AVAV has higher volatility (29.43%) compared to NFLX (13.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NFLX dropped -81.99% vs AVAV's -66.65%.
AVAV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.66 vs -1.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for NFLX and AVAV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer