PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NFLW vs. XDTE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NFLW vs. XDTE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill NFLX WeeklyPay ETF (NFLW) and Roundhill S&P 500 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (XDTE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NFLW achieves a -16.78% return, which is significantly lower than XDTE's 8.83% return.


NFLW

1D
-2.48%
1M
-12.48%
YTD
-16.78%
6M
-26.68%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

XDTE

1D
-0.66%
1M
4.14%
YTD
8.83%
6M
8.93%
1Y
25.68%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NFLW vs. XDTE - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between NFLW and XDTE is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 20, 2025

0.16

NFLW vs. XDTE - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
NFLW
XDTE

Communication Services

25.9%
11.2%

Basic Materials

-

1.8%

Consumer Cyclical

-

10.1%

Consumer Defensive

-

4.9%

Energy

-

3.5%

Financial Services

-

11.8%

Healthcare

-

8.5%

Industrials

-

8.3%

Real Estate

-

1.9%

Technology

-

35.6%

Utilities

-

2.4%

Communication Services

NFLW
25.9%
XDTE
11.2%

Basic Materials

NFLW

-

XDTE
1.8%

Consumer Cyclical

NFLW

-

XDTE
10.1%

Consumer Defensive

NFLW

-

XDTE
4.9%

Energy

NFLW

-

XDTE
3.5%

Financial Services

NFLW

-

XDTE
11.8%

Healthcare

NFLW

-

XDTE
8.5%

Industrials

NFLW

-

XDTE
8.3%

Real Estate

NFLW

-

XDTE
1.9%

Technology

NFLW

-

XDTE
35.6%

Utilities

NFLW

-

XDTE
2.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NFLW vs. XDTE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NFLW

XDTE
XDTE Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
XDTE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XDTE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
XDTE Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
XDTE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
XDTE Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NFLW vs. XDTE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill NFLX WeeklyPay ETF (NFLW) and Roundhill S&P 500 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (XDTE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

NFLW vs. XDTE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NFLWXDTEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.35

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-1.05

1.25

-2.30

Drawdowns

NFLW vs. XDTE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NFLW drawdown since its inception was -50.73%, which is greater than XDTE's maximum drawdown of -19.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NFLW and XDTE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NFLWXDTEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-50.73%

-19.09%

-31.64%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.68%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-47.00%

-0.66%

-46.34%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-26.84%

-2.32%

-24.52%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.68%

Volatility

NFLW vs. XDTE - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NFLWXDTEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.53%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.28%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

40.34%

10.99%

+29.35%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

40.34%

13.85%

+26.49%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

40.34%

13.85%

+26.49%

NFLW vs. XDTE - Expense Ratio Comparison

NFLW has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than XDTE's 0.97% expense ratio.


Dividends

NFLW vs. XDTE - Dividend Comparison

NFLW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 73.24%, more than XDTE's 33.00% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
NFLW
Roundhill NFLX WeeklyPay ETF
73.24%38.89%0.00%
XDTE
Roundhill S&P 500 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF
33.00%39.16%20.35%

Frequently Asked Questions


NFLW and XDTE have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XDTE is cheaper at 0.97% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XDTE is cheaper with a 0.97% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for NFLW.

NFLW has the higher dividend yield at 73.24%, compared with 33.00% for XDTE.

Their fees differ too: 0.99% for NFLW and 0.97% for XDTE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NFLW and XDTE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer