NFLW vs. TSMY
NFLW (Roundhill NFLX WeeklyPay ETF) and TSMY (YieldMax TSM Option Income Strategy ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, NFLW returned -50.09% vs 82.45% for TSMY. At a 0.06 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.99% expense ratio.
Performance
NFLW vs. TSMY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NFLW achieves a -27.54% return, which is significantly lower than TSMY's 35.90% return.
NFLW
- 1D
- 0.08%
- 1M
- -21.07%
- YTD
- -27.54%
- 6M
- -27.44%
- 1Y
- -50.09%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TSMY
- 1D
- -5.90%
- 1M
- 5.93%
- YTD
- 35.90%
- 6M
- 38.06%
- 1Y
- 82.45%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NFLW vs. TSMY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
NFLW Roundhill NFLX WeeklyPay ETF | -27.54% | -29.54% |
TSMY YieldMax TSM Option Income Strategy ETF | 35.90% | 33.06% |
Correlation
The correlation between NFLW and TSMY is 0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.07 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 18, 2025 | 0.06 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NFLW vs. TSMY — Risk / Return Rank
NFLW
TSMY
NFLW vs. TSMY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill NFLX WeeklyPay ETF (NFLW) and YieldMax TSM Option Income Strategy ETF (TSMY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| NFLW | TSMY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.91 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -5.21 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.75 | 1.43 | -0.68 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.93 | 5.35 | -6.28 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.59 | 19.38 | -20.97 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
NFLW vs. TSMY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NFLW drawdown since its inception was -53.89%, which is greater than TSMY's maximum drawdown of -31.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NFLW and TSMY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NFLW | TSMY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -53.89% | -31.15% | -22.74% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -53.89% | -15.50% | -38.39% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -53.85% | -5.90% | -47.95% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -27.86% | -5.44% | -22.42% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 31.61% | 4.27% | +27.34% |
Volatility
NFLW vs. TSMY - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Roundhill NFLX WeeklyPay ETF (NFLW) is 9.81%, while YieldMax TSM Option Income Strategy ETF (TSMY) has a volatility of 13.61%. This indicates that NFLW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TSMY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NFLW | TSMY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.81% | 13.61% | -3.80% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 30.49% | 25.03% | +5.46% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 40.43% | 31.14% | +9.29% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 40.29% | 33.94% | +6.35% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 40.29% | 33.94% | +6.35% |
NFLW vs. TSMY - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both NFLW and TSMY have an expense ratio of 0.99%.
Dividends
NFLW vs. TSMY - Dividend Comparison
NFLW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 87.68%, more than TSMY's 51.03% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
NFLW Roundhill NFLX WeeklyPay ETF | 87.68% | 38.89% | 0.00% |
TSMY YieldMax TSM Option Income Strategy ETF | 51.03% | 56.76% | 13.71% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NFLW and TSMY have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TSMY has higher volatility (13.61%) compared to NFLW (9.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NFLW dropped -53.89% vs TSMY's -31.15%.
On 1-year performance, TSMY leads with 82.45% vs -50.09% for NFLW. Both ETFs have the same 0.99% expense ratio. On volatility, NFLW has been the lower-risk option at 9.81%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, TSMY has performed better with a 82.45% return vs -50.09%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
NFLW and TSMY have the same expense ratio: 0.99% per year.
NFLW has the higher dividend yield at 87.68%, compared with 51.03% for TSMY.
They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and YieldMax.
TSMY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.66 vs -1.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for NFLW and TSMY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer