NFLW vs. TOPW
NFLW (Roundhill NFLX WeeklyPay ETF) and TOPW (Roundhill Top WeeklyPay ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. NFLW is actively managed, while TOPW is passively managed. At a 0.26 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.99% expense ratio.
Performance
NFLW vs. TOPW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NFLW achieves a -16.78% return, which is significantly lower than TOPW's 7.71% return.
NFLW
- 1D
- -2.48%
- 1M
- -12.48%
- YTD
- -16.78%
- 6M
- -26.68%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TOPW
- 1D
- -1.52%
- 1M
- 3.60%
- YTD
- 7.71%
- 6M
- -0.67%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NFLW vs. TOPW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
NFLW Roundhill NFLX WeeklyPay ETF | -16.78% | -30.68% |
TOPW Roundhill Top WeeklyPay ETF | 7.71% | -2.47% |
Correlation
The correlation between NFLW and TOPW is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 5, 2025 | 0.26 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NFLW vs. TOPW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill NFLX WeeklyPay ETF (NFLW) and Roundhill Top WeeklyPay ETF (TOPW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NFLW | TOPW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -1.05 | 0.25 | -1.31 |
Drawdowns
NFLW vs. TOPW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NFLW drawdown since its inception was -50.73%, which is greater than TOPW's maximum drawdown of -29.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NFLW and TOPW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NFLW | TOPW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -50.73% | -29.87% | -20.86% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -47.00% | -10.02% | -36.98% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -26.84% | -12.88% | -13.96% |
Volatility
NFLW vs. TOPW - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NFLW | TOPW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 40.34% | 27.36% | +12.98% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 40.34% | 27.36% | +12.98% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 40.34% | 27.36% | +12.98% |
NFLW vs. TOPW - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both NFLW and TOPW have an expense ratio of 0.99%.
Dividends
NFLW vs. TOPW - Dividend Comparison
NFLW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 73.24%, more than TOPW's 40.33% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
NFLW Roundhill NFLX WeeklyPay ETF | 73.24% | 38.89% |
TOPW Roundhill Top WeeklyPay ETF | 40.33% | 21.52% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NFLW and TOPW have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.99% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
NFLW and TOPW have the same expense ratio: 0.99% per year.
NFLW has the higher dividend yield at 73.24%, compared with 40.33% for TOPW.
They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and Roundhill Investments.
Find the right allocation for NFLW and TOPW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer