NFLW vs. THTA
NFLW (Roundhill NFLX WeeklyPay ETF) and THTA (SoFi Enhanced Yield ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, NFLW returned -50.09% vs 16.54% for THTA. At a 0.05 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. NFLW charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for THTA.
Performance
NFLW vs. THTA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NFLW achieves a -27.54% return, which is significantly lower than THTA's 7.57% return.
NFLW
- 1D
- 0.08%
- 1M
- -21.07%
- YTD
- -27.54%
- 6M
- -27.44%
- 1Y
- -50.09%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
THTA
- 1D
- -0.06%
- 1M
- 0.77%
- YTD
- 7.57%
- 6M
- 8.24%
- 1Y
- 16.54%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NFLW vs. THTA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
NFLW Roundhill NFLX WeeklyPay ETF | -27.54% | -29.54% |
THTA SoFi Enhanced Yield ETF | 7.57% | 8.64% |
Correlation
The correlation between NFLW and THTA is 0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.05 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 18, 2025 | 0.05 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NFLW vs. THTA — Risk / Return Rank
NFLW
THTA
NFLW vs. THTA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill NFLX WeeklyPay ETF (NFLW) and SoFi Enhanced Yield ETF (THTA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| NFLW | THTA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -4.15 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -6.28 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.75 | 1.77 | -1.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.93 | 6.30 | -7.23 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.59 | 52.38 | -53.97 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
NFLW vs. THTA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NFLW drawdown since its inception was -53.89%, which is greater than THTA's maximum drawdown of -31.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NFLW and THTA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NFLW | THTA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -53.89% | -31.41% | -22.48% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -53.89% | -2.64% | -51.25% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -53.85% | -6.17% | -47.68% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -27.86% | -7.49% | -20.37% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 31.61% | 0.32% | +31.29% |
Volatility
NFLW vs. THTA - Volatility Comparison
Roundhill NFLX WeeklyPay ETF (NFLW) has a higher volatility of 9.81% compared to SoFi Enhanced Yield ETF (THTA) at 0.96%. This indicates that NFLW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than THTA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NFLW | THTA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.81% | 0.96% | +8.85% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 30.49% | 4.07% | +26.42% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 40.43% | 5.72% | +34.71% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 40.29% | 20.04% | +20.25% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 40.29% | 20.04% | +20.25% |
NFLW vs. THTA - Expense Ratio Comparison
NFLW has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than THTA's 0.49% expense ratio.
Dividends
NFLW vs. THTA - Dividend Comparison
NFLW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 87.68%, more than THTA's 11.15% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
NFLW Roundhill NFLX WeeklyPay ETF | 87.68% | 38.89% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
THTA SoFi Enhanced Yield ETF | 11.15% | 12.66% | 12.44% | 0.58% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NFLW and THTA have a correlation of 0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NFLW has higher volatility (9.81%) compared to THTA (0.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NFLW dropped -53.89% vs THTA's -31.41%.
On 1-year performance, THTA leads with 16.54% vs -50.09% for NFLW. On fees, THTA is cheaper at 0.49% per year. On volatility, THTA has been the lower-risk option at 0.96%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, THTA has performed better with a 16.54% return vs -50.09%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
THTA is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for NFLW.
NFLW has the higher dividend yield at 87.68%, compared with 11.15% for THTA.
They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and SoFi. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for NFLW and 0.49% for THTA.
THTA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.90 vs -1.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for NFLW and THTA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer