PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NFLW vs. THTA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NFLW vs. THTA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill NFLX WeeklyPay ETF (NFLW) and SoFi Enhanced Yield ETF (THTA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NFLW achieves a -27.54% return, which is significantly lower than THTA's 7.57% return.


NFLW

1D
0.08%
1M
-21.07%
YTD
-27.54%
6M
-27.44%
1Y
-50.09%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

THTA

1D
-0.06%
1M
0.77%
YTD
7.57%
6M
8.24%
1Y
16.54%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NFLW vs. THTA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
NFLW
Roundhill NFLX WeeklyPay ETF
-27.54%-29.54%
THTA
SoFi Enhanced Yield ETF
7.57%8.64%

Correlation

The correlation between NFLW and THTA is 0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.05

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 18, 2025

0.05

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NFLW vs. THTA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NFLW
NFLW Risk / Return Rank: 11
Overall Rank
NFLW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 00
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NFLW Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
Sortino Ratio Rank
NFLW Omega Ratio Rank: 00
Omega Ratio Rank
NFLW Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
NFLW Martin Ratio Rank: 11
Martin Ratio Rank

THTA
THTA Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
THTA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
THTA Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
THTA Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
THTA Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
THTA Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NFLW vs. THTA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill NFLX WeeklyPay ETF (NFLW) and SoFi Enhanced Yield ETF (THTA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


NFLWTHTADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-4.15

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-6.28

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.75

1.77

-1.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.93

6.30

-7.23

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.59

52.38

-53.97

NFLW vs. THTA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NFLW Sharpe Ratio is -1.24, which is lower than the THTA Sharpe Ratio of 2.90. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NFLW and THTA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NFLW vs. THTA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NFLW drawdown since its inception was -53.89%, which is greater than THTA's maximum drawdown of -31.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NFLW and THTA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NFLWTHTADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-53.89%

-31.41%

-22.48%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-53.89%

-2.64%

-51.25%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-53.85%

-6.17%

-47.68%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-27.86%

-7.49%

-20.37%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

31.61%

0.32%

+31.29%

Volatility

NFLW vs. THTA - Volatility Comparison

Roundhill NFLX WeeklyPay ETF (NFLW) has a higher volatility of 9.81% compared to SoFi Enhanced Yield ETF (THTA) at 0.96%. This indicates that NFLW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than THTA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NFLWTHTADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.81%

0.96%

+8.85%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

30.49%

4.07%

+26.42%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

40.43%

5.72%

+34.71%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

40.29%

20.04%

+20.25%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

40.29%

20.04%

+20.25%

NFLW vs. THTA - Expense Ratio Comparison

NFLW has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than THTA's 0.49% expense ratio.


Dividends

NFLW vs. THTA - Dividend Comparison

NFLW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 87.68%, more than THTA's 11.15% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
NFLW
Roundhill NFLX WeeklyPay ETF
87.68%38.89%0.00%0.00%
THTA
SoFi Enhanced Yield ETF
11.15%12.66%12.44%0.58%

Frequently Asked Questions


NFLW and THTA have a correlation of 0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NFLW has higher volatility (9.81%) compared to THTA (0.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NFLW dropped -53.89% vs THTA's -31.41%.

On 1-year performance, THTA leads with 16.54% vs -50.09% for NFLW. On fees, THTA is cheaper at 0.49% per year. On volatility, THTA has been the lower-risk option at 0.96%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, THTA has performed better with a 16.54% return vs -50.09%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

THTA is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for NFLW.

NFLW has the higher dividend yield at 87.68%, compared with 11.15% for THTA.

They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and SoFi. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for NFLW and 0.49% for THTA.

THTA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.90 vs -1.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NFLW and THTA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer