PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NFLW vs. SPIN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NFLW vs. SPIN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill NFLX WeeklyPay ETF (NFLW) and State Street US Equity Premium Income ETF (SPIN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NFLW achieves a -27.54% return, which is significantly lower than SPIN's 0.41% return.


NFLW

1D
0.08%
1M
-21.07%
YTD
-27.54%
6M
-27.44%
1Y
-50.09%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

SPIN

1D
-1.10%
1M
-1.32%
YTD
0.41%
6M
-0.02%
1Y
14.96%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NFLW vs. SPIN - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
NFLW
Roundhill NFLX WeeklyPay ETF
-27.54%-29.54%
SPIN
State Street US Equity Premium Income ETF
0.41%14.70%

Correlation

The correlation between NFLW and SPIN is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.20

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 18, 2025

0.21

NFLW vs. SPIN - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
NFLW
SPIN

Communication Services

28.3%
11.9%

Basic Materials

-

2.3%

Consumer Cyclical

-

8.6%

Consumer Defensive

-

3.6%

Energy

-

2.7%

Financial Services

-

11.3%

Healthcare

-

8.3%

Industrials

-

8.1%

Real Estate

-

1.5%

Technology

-

39.6%

Utilities

-

2.2%

Communication Services

NFLW
28.3%
SPIN
11.9%

Basic Materials

NFLW

-

SPIN
2.3%

Consumer Cyclical

NFLW

-

SPIN
8.6%

Consumer Defensive

NFLW

-

SPIN
3.6%

Energy

NFLW

-

SPIN
2.7%

Financial Services

NFLW

-

SPIN
11.3%

Healthcare

NFLW

-

SPIN
8.3%

Industrials

NFLW

-

SPIN
8.1%

Real Estate

NFLW

-

SPIN
1.5%

Technology

NFLW

-

SPIN
39.6%

Utilities

NFLW

-

SPIN
2.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NFLW vs. SPIN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NFLW
NFLW Risk / Return Rank: 11
Overall Rank
NFLW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 00
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NFLW Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
Sortino Ratio Rank
NFLW Omega Ratio Rank: 00
Omega Ratio Rank
NFLW Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
NFLW Martin Ratio Rank: 11
Martin Ratio Rank

SPIN
SPIN Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
SPIN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPIN Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPIN Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
SPIN Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPIN Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NFLW vs. SPIN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill NFLX WeeklyPay ETF (NFLW) and State Street US Equity Premium Income ETF (SPIN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


NFLWSPINDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.59

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.86

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.75

1.25

-0.50

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.93

1.53

-2.46

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.59

6.26

-7.84

NFLW vs. SPIN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NFLW Sharpe Ratio is -1.24, which is lower than the SPIN Sharpe Ratio of 1.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NFLW and SPIN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NFLW vs. SPIN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NFLW drawdown since its inception was -53.89%, which is greater than SPIN's maximum drawdown of -16.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NFLW and SPIN.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NFLWSPINDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-53.89%

-16.85%

-37.04%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-53.89%

-9.81%

-44.08%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-53.85%

-2.82%

-51.03%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-27.86%

-2.27%

-25.59%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

31.61%

2.40%

+29.21%

Volatility

NFLW vs. SPIN - Volatility Comparison

Roundhill NFLX WeeklyPay ETF (NFLW) has a higher volatility of 9.81% compared to State Street US Equity Premium Income ETF (SPIN) at 4.22%. This indicates that NFLW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPIN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NFLWSPINDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.81%

4.22%

+5.59%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

30.49%

8.77%

+21.72%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

40.43%

11.16%

+29.27%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

40.29%

14.43%

+25.86%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

40.29%

14.43%

+25.86%

NFLW vs. SPIN - Expense Ratio Comparison

NFLW has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than SPIN's 0.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

NFLW vs. SPIN - Dividend Comparison

NFLW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 87.68%, more than SPIN's 5.78% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
NFLW
Roundhill NFLX WeeklyPay ETF
87.68%38.89%0.00%
SPIN
State Street US Equity Premium Income ETF
5.78%8.20%2.36%

Frequently Asked Questions


NFLW and SPIN have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NFLW has higher volatility (9.81%) compared to SPIN (4.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NFLW dropped -53.89% vs SPIN's -16.85%.

On 1-year performance, SPIN leads with 14.96% vs -50.09% for NFLW. On fees, SPIN is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, SPIN has been the lower-risk option at 4.22%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, SPIN has performed better with a 14.96% return vs -50.09%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPIN is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for NFLW.

NFLW has the higher dividend yield at 87.68%, compared with 5.78% for SPIN.

They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for NFLW and 0.25% for SPIN.

SPIN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.35 vs -1.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NFLW and SPIN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer