NFLW vs. OMAH

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

NFLW (Roundhill NFLX WeeklyPay ETF) and OMAH (VistaShares Target 15™ Berkshire Select Income ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, NFLW returned -52.02% vs 11.37% for OMAH. At a 0.20 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. NFLW charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for OMAH.

Performance

NFLW vs. OMAH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill NFLX WeeklyPay ETF (NFLW) and VistaShares Target 15™ Berkshire Select Income ETF (OMAH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NFLW achieves a -28.72% return, which is significantly lower than OMAH's 5.64% return.

NFLW

• 1D: -1.63%
• 1M: -22.35%
• YTD: -28.72%
• 6M: -28.62%
• 1Y: -52.02%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

OMAH

• 1D: 0.32%
• 1M: -1.65%
• YTD: 5.64%
• 6M: 5.18%
• 1Y: 11.37%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NFLW vs. OMAH - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
NFLW Roundhill NFLX WeeklyPay ETF	-28.72%	-29.54%
OMAH VistaShares Target 15™ Berkshire Select Income ETF	5.64%	7.02%

Correlation

The correlation between NFLW and OMAH is 0.19, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.19
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 18, 2025	0.20

NFLW vs. OMAH - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	NFLW	OMAH
Communication Services	28.3%	19.8%
Basic Materials	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	4.1%
Consumer Defensive	-	13.2%
Energy	-	8.8%
Financial Services	-	37.3%
Healthcare	-	4.4%
Industrials	-	4.9%
Real Estate	-	-
Technology	-	11.6%
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

NFLW vs. OMAH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NFLW

NFLW Risk / Return Rank: 0
NFLW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 0
NFLW Sortino Ratio Rank: 0
NFLW Omega Ratio Rank: 0
NFLW Calmar Ratio Rank: 1
NFLW Martin Ratio Rank: 1

OMAH

OMAH Risk / Return Rank: 53
OMAH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 45
OMAH Sortino Ratio Rank: 43
OMAH Omega Ratio Rank: 42
OMAH Calmar Ratio Rank: 80
OMAH Martin Ratio Rank: 57

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NFLW vs. OMAH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill NFLX WeeklyPay ETF (NFLW) and VistaShares Target 15™ Berkshire Select Income ETF (OMAH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	NFLW	OMAH	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-1.29	1.42	-2.72
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-2.11	2.00	-4.11
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.74	1.25	-0.51
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.96	3.80	-4.75
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.64	9.02	-10.65

NFLW vs. OMAH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NFLW Sharpe Ratio is -1.29, which is lower than the OMAH Sharpe Ratio of 1.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NFLW and OMAH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

NFLW vs. OMAH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NFLW drawdown since its inception was -54.60%, which is greater than OMAH's maximum drawdown of -11.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NFLW and OMAH.

Drawdown Indicators

	NFLW	OMAH	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-54.60%	-11.83%	-42.77%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-54.60%	-3.00%	-51.60%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-54.60%	-1.65%	-52.95%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-27.97%	-1.27%	-26.70%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	31.79%	1.26%	+30.53%

Volatility

NFLW vs. OMAH - Volatility Comparison

Roundhill NFLX WeeklyPay ETF (NFLW) has a higher volatility of 9.81% compared to VistaShares Target 15™ Berkshire Select Income ETF (OMAH) at 2.23%. This indicates that NFLW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than OMAH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	NFLW	OMAH	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.81%	2.23%	+7.58%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	30.51%	5.59%	+24.92%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	40.39%	8.03%	+32.36%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	40.24%	13.01%	+27.23%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	40.24%	13.01%	+27.23%

NFLW vs. OMAH - Expense Ratio Comparison

NFLW has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than OMAH's 0.95% expense ratio.

Dividends

NFLW vs. OMAH - Dividend Comparison

NFLW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 89.13%, more than OMAH's 14.01% yield.

Position	TTM	2025
NFLW Roundhill NFLX WeeklyPay ETF	89.13%	38.89%
OMAH VistaShares Target 15™ Berkshire Select Income ETF	14.01%	12.86%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both NFLW and OMAH in my portfolio?

NFLW and OMAH have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, NFLW or OMAH?

NFLW has higher volatility (9.81%) compared to OMAH (2.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NFLW dropped -54.60% vs OMAH's -11.83%.

Which ETF is better, NFLW or OMAH?

On 1-year performance, OMAH leads with 11.37% vs -52.02% for NFLW. On fees, OMAH is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, OMAH has been the lower-risk option at 2.23%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, NFLW or OMAH?

Over the 1-year period, OMAH has performed better with a 11.37% return vs -52.02%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, NFLW or OMAH?

OMAH is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for NFLW.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, NFLW or OMAH?

NFLW has the higher dividend yield at 89.13%, compared with 14.01% for OMAH.

What is the main difference between NFLW and OMAH?

They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and VistaShares. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for NFLW and 0.95% for OMAH.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

OMAH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.42 vs -1.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.