NFLW vs. LQTI
NFLW (Roundhill NFLX WeeklyPay ETF) and LQTI (FT Vest Investment Grade & Target Income ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. At a correlation of -0.05, they often move in opposite directions. NFLW charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for LQTI.
Performance
NFLW vs. LQTI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NFLW achieves a -16.78% return, which is significantly lower than LQTI's 0.16% return.
NFLW
- 1D
- -2.48%
- 1M
- -12.48%
- YTD
- -16.78%
- 6M
- -26.68%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
LQTI
- 1D
- -0.26%
- 1M
- 0.41%
- YTD
- 0.16%
- 6M
- -0.04%
- 1Y
- 5.69%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NFLW vs. LQTI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
NFLW Roundhill NFLX WeeklyPay ETF | -16.78% | -29.02% |
LQTI FT Vest Investment Grade & Target Income ETF | 0.16% | 4.99% |
Correlation
The correlation between NFLW and LQTI is -0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 20, 2025 | -0.05 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NFLW vs. LQTI — Risk / Return Rank
NFLW
LQTI
NFLW vs. LQTI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill NFLX WeeklyPay ETF (NFLW) and FT Vest Investment Grade & Target Income ETF (LQTI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NFLW | LQTI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 1.12 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -1.05 | 0.88 | -1.94 |
Drawdowns
NFLW vs. LQTI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NFLW drawdown since its inception was -50.73%, which is greater than LQTI's maximum drawdown of -3.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NFLW and LQTI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NFLW | LQTI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -50.73% | -3.41% | -47.32% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -3.41% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -47.00% | -1.44% | -45.56% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -26.84% | -0.88% | -25.96% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.11% | — |
Volatility
NFLW vs. LQTI - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NFLW | LQTI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 1.65% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 4.02% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 40.34% | 5.10% | +35.24% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 40.34% | 5.97% | +34.37% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 40.34% | 5.97% | +34.37% |
NFLW vs. LQTI - Expense Ratio Comparison
NFLW has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than LQTI's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
NFLW vs. LQTI - Dividend Comparison
NFLW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 73.24%, more than LQTI's 9.11% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
LQTI FT Vest Investment Grade & Target Income ETF | 9.11% | 7.01% |
NFLW Roundhill NFLX WeeklyPay ETF | 73.24% | 38.89% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NFLW and LQTI have a correlation of -0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, LQTI is cheaper at 0.65% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
LQTI is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for NFLW.
NFLW has the higher dividend yield at 73.24%, compared with 9.11% for LQTI.
They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and FT Vest. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for NFLW and 0.65% for LQTI.
Find the right allocation for NFLW and LQTI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer