NFLW vs. LQTI
NFLW (Roundhill NFLX WeeklyPay ETF) and LQTI (FT Vest Investment Grade & Target Income ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, NFLW returned -50.09% vs 4.91% for LQTI. At a correlation of -0.05, they often move in opposite directions. NFLW charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for LQTI.
Performance
NFLW vs. LQTI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NFLW achieves a -27.54% return, which is significantly lower than LQTI's 0.47% return.
NFLW
- 1D
- 0.08%
- 1M
- -21.07%
- YTD
- -27.54%
- 6M
- -27.44%
- 1Y
- -50.09%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
LQTI
- 1D
- 0.16%
- 1M
- 0.54%
- YTD
- 0.47%
- 6M
- 1.08%
- 1Y
- 4.91%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NFLW vs. LQTI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
NFLW Roundhill NFLX WeeklyPay ETF | -27.54% | -29.54% |
LQTI FT Vest Investment Grade & Target Income ETF | 0.47% | 5.10% |
Correlation
The correlation between NFLW and LQTI is -0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.06 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 18, 2025 | -0.05 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NFLW vs. LQTI — Risk / Return Rank
NFLW
LQTI
NFLW vs. LQTI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill NFLX WeeklyPay ETF (NFLW) and FT Vest Investment Grade & Target Income ETF (LQTI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| NFLW | LQTI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.21 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.40 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.75 | 1.17 | -0.42 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.93 | 1.45 | -2.38 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.59 | 4.30 | -5.88 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
NFLW vs. LQTI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NFLW drawdown since its inception was -53.89%, which is greater than LQTI's maximum drawdown of -3.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NFLW and LQTI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NFLW | LQTI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -53.89% | -3.41% | -50.48% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -53.89% | -3.41% | -50.48% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -53.85% | -1.13% | -52.72% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -27.86% | -0.90% | -26.96% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 31.61% | 1.15% | +30.46% |
Volatility
NFLW vs. LQTI - Volatility Comparison
Roundhill NFLX WeeklyPay ETF (NFLW) has a higher volatility of 9.81% compared to FT Vest Investment Grade & Target Income ETF (LQTI) at 1.54%. This indicates that NFLW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LQTI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NFLW | LQTI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.81% | 1.54% | +8.27% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 30.49% | 4.13% | +26.36% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 40.43% | 5.11% | +35.32% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 40.29% | 5.94% | +34.35% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 40.29% | 5.94% | +34.35% |
NFLW vs. LQTI - Expense Ratio Comparison
NFLW has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than LQTI's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
NFLW vs. LQTI - Dividend Comparison
NFLW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 87.68%, more than LQTI's 9.08% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
LQTI FT Vest Investment Grade & Target Income ETF | 9.08% | 7.01% |
NFLW Roundhill NFLX WeeklyPay ETF | 87.68% | 38.89% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NFLW and LQTI have a correlation of -0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NFLW has higher volatility (9.81%) compared to LQTI (1.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NFLW dropped -53.89% vs LQTI's -3.41%.
On 1-year performance, LQTI leads with 4.91% vs -50.09% for NFLW. On fees, LQTI is cheaper at 0.65% per year. On volatility, LQTI has been the lower-risk option at 1.54%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, LQTI has performed better with a 4.91% return vs -50.09%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
LQTI is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for NFLW.
NFLW has the higher dividend yield at 87.68%, compared with 9.08% for LQTI.
They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and FT Vest. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for NFLW and 0.65% for LQTI.
LQTI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.97 vs -1.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for NFLW and LQTI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer