NFLW vs. LQTI
Compare and contrast key facts about Roundhill NFLX WeeklyPay ETF (NFLW) and FT Vest Investment Grade & Target Income ETF (LQTI).
NFLW and LQTI are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. NFLW is an actively managed fund by Roundhill. It was launched on Jun 18, 2025. LQTI is an actively managed fund by FT Vest. It was launched on Feb 11, 2025.
Performance
NFLW vs. LQTI - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
NFLW vs. LQTI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
NFLW Roundhill NFLX WeeklyPay ETF | 1.32% | -29.02% |
LQTI FT Vest Investment Grade & Target Income ETF | -0.44% | 4.99% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NFLW achieves a 1.32% return, which is significantly higher than LQTI's -0.44% return.
NFLW
- 1D
- -0.64%
- 1M
- -1.99%
- YTD
- 1.32%
- 6M
- -23.51%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
LQTI
- 1D
- 0.07%
- 1M
- -1.73%
- YTD
- -0.44%
- 6M
- -0.03%
- 1Y
- 4.56%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
NFLW vs. LQTI - Expense Ratio Comparison
NFLW has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than LQTI's 0.65% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
NFLW vs. LQTI — Risk / Return Rank
NFLW
LQTI
NFLW vs. LQTI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill NFLX WeeklyPay ETF (NFLW) and FT Vest Investment Grade & Target Income ETF (LQTI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NFLW | LQTI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 0.74 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.86 | 0.90 | -1.76 |
Correlation
The correlation between NFLW and LQTI is -0.06. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.
Dividends
NFLW vs. LQTI - Dividend Comparison
NFLW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 50.81%, more than LQTI's 9.07% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
NFLW Roundhill NFLX WeeklyPay ETF | 50.81% | 38.89% |
LQTI FT Vest Investment Grade & Target Income ETF | 9.07% | 7.01% |
Drawdowns
NFLW vs. LQTI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NFLW drawdown since its inception was -50.73%, which is greater than LQTI's maximum drawdown of -3.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NFLW and LQTI.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| NFLW | LQTI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -50.73% | -3.41% | -47.32% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -3.41% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -35.48% | -2.03% | -33.45% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -24.33% | -0.78% | -23.55% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.12% | — |
Volatility
NFLW vs. LQTI - Volatility Comparison
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| NFLW | LQTI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 2.66% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 3.87% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 40.26% | 6.23% | +34.03% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 40.26% | 6.11% | +34.15% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 40.26% | 6.11% | +34.15% |