PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NFLW vs. HYTI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NFLW vs. HYTI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill NFLX WeeklyPay ETF (NFLW) and FT Vest High Yield & Target Income ETF (HYTI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NFLW achieves a -27.54% return, which is significantly lower than HYTI's 1.74% return.


NFLW

1D
0.08%
1M
-21.07%
YTD
-27.54%
6M
-27.44%
1Y
-50.09%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

HYTI

1D
-0.16%
1M
0.26%
YTD
1.74%
6M
2.02%
1Y
6.07%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NFLW vs. HYTI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
NFLW
Roundhill NFLX WeeklyPay ETF
-27.54%-29.54%
HYTI
FT Vest High Yield & Target Income ETF
1.74%4.99%

Correlation

The correlation between NFLW and HYTI is 0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.05

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 18, 2025

0.06

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NFLW vs. HYTI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NFLW
NFLW Risk / Return Rank: 11
Overall Rank
NFLW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 00
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NFLW Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
Sortino Ratio Rank
NFLW Omega Ratio Rank: 00
Omega Ratio Rank
NFLW Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
NFLW Martin Ratio Rank: 11
Martin Ratio Rank

HYTI
HYTI Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
HYTI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HYTI Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
HYTI Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
HYTI Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
HYTI Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NFLW vs. HYTI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill NFLX WeeklyPay ETF (NFLW) and FT Vest High Yield & Target Income ETF (HYTI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


NFLWHYTIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.82

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-4.32

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.75

1.30

-0.55

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.93

2.56

-3.49

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.59

10.78

-12.37

NFLW vs. HYTI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NFLW Sharpe Ratio is -1.24, which is lower than the HYTI Sharpe Ratio of 1.58. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NFLW and HYTI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NFLW vs. HYTI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NFLW drawdown since its inception was -53.89%, which is greater than HYTI's maximum drawdown of -4.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NFLW and HYTI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NFLWHYTIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-53.89%

-4.47%

-49.42%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-53.89%

-2.38%

-51.51%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-53.85%

-0.31%

-53.54%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-27.86%

-0.45%

-27.41%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

31.61%

0.56%

+31.05%

Volatility

NFLW vs. HYTI - Volatility Comparison

Roundhill NFLX WeeklyPay ETF (NFLW) has a higher volatility of 9.81% compared to FT Vest High Yield & Target Income ETF (HYTI) at 1.06%. This indicates that NFLW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HYTI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NFLWHYTIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.81%

1.06%

+8.75%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

30.49%

3.10%

+27.39%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

40.43%

3.86%

+36.57%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

40.29%

5.17%

+35.12%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

40.29%

5.17%

+35.12%

NFLW vs. HYTI - Expense Ratio Comparison

NFLW has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than HYTI's 0.65% expense ratio.


Dividends

NFLW vs. HYTI - Dividend Comparison

NFLW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 87.68%, more than HYTI's 10.41% yield.


PositionTTM2025
HYTI
FT Vest High Yield & Target Income ETF
10.41%8.10%
NFLW
Roundhill NFLX WeeklyPay ETF
87.68%38.89%

Frequently Asked Questions


NFLW and HYTI have a correlation of 0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NFLW has higher volatility (9.81%) compared to HYTI (1.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NFLW dropped -53.89% vs HYTI's -4.47%.

On 1-year performance, HYTI leads with 6.07% vs -50.09% for NFLW. On fees, HYTI is cheaper at 0.65% per year. On volatility, HYTI has been the lower-risk option at 1.06%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, HYTI has performed better with a 6.07% return vs -50.09%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

HYTI is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for NFLW.

NFLW has the higher dividend yield at 87.68%, compared with 10.41% for HYTI.

They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and FT Vest. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for NFLW and 0.65% for HYTI.

HYTI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.58 vs -1.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NFLW and HYTI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer