NFLW vs. FYEE
NFLW (Roundhill NFLX WeeklyPay ETF) and FYEE (Fidelity Yield Enhanced Equity ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, NFLW returned -52.02% vs 19.79% for FYEE. At a 0.21 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. NFLW charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.28%/yr for FYEE.
Performance
NFLW vs. FYEE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NFLW achieves a -28.72% return, which is significantly lower than FYEE's 5.09% return.
NFLW
- 1D
- -1.63%
- 1M
- -22.35%
- YTD
- -28.72%
- 6M
- -28.62%
- 1Y
- -52.02%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FYEE
- 1D
- -0.14%
- 1M
- -0.85%
- YTD
- 5.09%
- 6M
- 4.40%
- 1Y
- 19.79%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NFLW vs. FYEE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
NFLW Roundhill NFLX WeeklyPay ETF | -28.72% | -29.54% |
FYEE Fidelity Yield Enhanced Equity ETF | 5.09% | 15.97% |
Correlation
The correlation between NFLW and FYEE is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 18, 2025 | 0.21 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NFLW vs. FYEE — Risk / Return Rank
NFLW
FYEE
NFLW vs. FYEE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill NFLX WeeklyPay ETF (NFLW) and Fidelity Yield Enhanced Equity ETF (FYEE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| NFLW | FYEE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.24 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.72 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.74 | 1.39 | -0.65 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.96 | 2.69 | -3.65 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.64 | 13.12 | -14.76 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
NFLW vs. FYEE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NFLW drawdown since its inception was -54.60%, which is greater than FYEE's maximum drawdown of -18.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NFLW and FYEE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NFLW | FYEE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -54.60% | -18.79% | -35.81% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -54.60% | -7.39% | -47.21% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -54.60% | -2.11% | -52.49% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -27.97% | -2.23% | -25.74% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 31.79% | 1.51% | +30.28% |
Volatility
NFLW vs. FYEE - Volatility Comparison
Roundhill NFLX WeeklyPay ETF (NFLW) has a higher volatility of 9.81% compared to Fidelity Yield Enhanced Equity ETF (FYEE) at 4.13%. This indicates that NFLW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FYEE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NFLW | FYEE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.81% | 4.13% | +5.68% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 30.51% | 8.10% | +22.41% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 40.39% | 10.27% | +30.12% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 40.24% | 13.92% | +26.32% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 40.24% | 13.92% | +26.32% |
NFLW vs. FYEE - Expense Ratio Comparison
NFLW has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than FYEE's 0.28% expense ratio.
Dividends
NFLW vs. FYEE - Dividend Comparison
NFLW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 89.13%, more than FYEE's 8.65% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
FYEE Fidelity Yield Enhanced Equity ETF | 8.65% | 7.08% | 5.45% |
NFLW Roundhill NFLX WeeklyPay ETF | 89.13% | 38.89% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NFLW and FYEE have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NFLW has higher volatility (9.81%) compared to FYEE (4.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NFLW dropped -54.60% vs FYEE's -18.79%.
On 1-year performance, FYEE leads with 19.79% vs -52.02% for NFLW. On fees, FYEE is cheaper at 0.28% per year. On volatility, FYEE has been the lower-risk option at 4.13%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, FYEE has performed better with a 19.79% return vs -52.02%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FYEE is cheaper with a 0.28% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for NFLW.
NFLW has the higher dividend yield at 89.13%, compared with 8.65% for FYEE.
They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for NFLW and 0.28% for FYEE.
FYEE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.94 vs -1.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for NFLW and FYEE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer