NFLW vs. CWII

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

NFLW (Roundhill NFLX WeeklyPay ETF) and CWII (REX CRWV Growth & Income ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. At a correlation of -0.01, they often move in opposite directions. NFLW charges 0.99%/yr vs 1.03%/yr for CWII.

Performance

NFLW vs. CWII - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill NFLX WeeklyPay ETF (NFLW) and REX CRWV Growth & Income ETF (CWII). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NFLW achieves a -27.54% return, which is significantly lower than CWII's 13,199.78% return.

NFLW

• 1D: 0.08%
• 1M: -21.07%
• YTD: -27.54%
• 6M: -27.44%
• 1Y: -50.09%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CWII

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 10,273.16%
• YTD: 13,199.78%
• 6M: 11,946.90%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NFLW vs. CWII - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
NFLW Roundhill NFLX WeeklyPay ETF	-27.54%	-18.13%
CWII REX CRWV Growth & Income ETF	13,199.78%	-45.06%

Correlation

The correlation between NFLW and CWII is -0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 4, 2025	-0.01

Return for Risk

NFLW vs. CWII — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NFLW

NFLW Risk / Return Rank: 1
NFLW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 0
NFLW Sortino Ratio Rank: 1
NFLW Omega Ratio Rank: 0
NFLW Calmar Ratio Rank: 1
NFLW Martin Ratio Rank: 1

CWII

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NFLW vs. CWII - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill NFLX WeeklyPay ETF (NFLW) and REX CRWV Growth & Income ETF (CWII). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	NFLW	CWII	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-1.24	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-1.99	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.75	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.93	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.59	—	—

Drawdowns

NFLW vs. CWII - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NFLW drawdown since its inception was -53.89%, which is greater than CWII's maximum drawdown of -51.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NFLW and CWII.

Drawdown Indicators

	NFLW	CWII	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-53.89%	-51.04%	-2.85%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-53.89%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-53.85%	0.00%	-53.85%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-27.86%	-33.26%	+5.40%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	31.61%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	NFLW	CWII	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.81%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	30.49%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	40.43%	13,701.30%	-13,660.87%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	40.29%	13,701.30%	-13,661.01%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	40.29%	13,701.30%	-13,661.01%

NFLW vs. CWII - Expense Ratio Comparison

NFLW has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is lower than CWII's 1.03% expense ratio.

Dividends

NFLW vs. CWII - Dividend Comparison

NFLW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 87.68%, less than CWII's 123.26% yield.

Position	TTM	2025
CWII REX CRWV Growth & Income ETF	123.26%	6.09%
NFLW Roundhill NFLX WeeklyPay ETF	87.68%	38.89%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both NFLW and CWII in my portfolio?

NFLW and CWII have a correlation of -0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, NFLW or CWII?

On fees, NFLW is cheaper at 0.99% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, NFLW or CWII?

NFLW is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 1.03% for CWII.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, NFLW or CWII?

CWII has the higher dividend yield at 123.26%, compared with 87.68% for NFLW.

What is the main difference between NFLW and CWII?

They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and REX Shares. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for NFLW and 1.03% for CWII.